Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All,
I keep noticing something which looks odd to me - I am sure it is correct because this appears to be standard practice, but I would appreciate it if someone could shed some light on the reasons... Take a peek at http://web.telia.com/~u85920178/tx/500w-txt.htm (first example I found). Specifically look at the 5 position switch on the output matching, in position 5, the bulk of the inductor is shorted out. This just looks plain wrong to me. I assume that having shorted turns on an inductor like this drops the Q drastically, or is this the whole point ? Is the same true for roller coaster type variable inductors ? Comments appreciated. Thanks, Mark. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question: HV Variable Caps from Printed Circuit Board | Homebrew | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
Three short simple questions about antennas | Antenna | |||
Address the issues, Skippy! Repost #3 | CB |