Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ) writes: I have built a few dozen regen receivers and they all seem to work well enough on AM signals--some extremely well--but kind of fall apart when it comes to STABLE reception of CW and SSB. Has anyone ever built a solid state regen that does well with CW and SSB? If so I would love to know how you did it (I'd even share my some of my massive collection of radio parts with you)...before I go off and build another dozen regens. I have a box full of prototypes affectionately dubbed my radio reject graveyard (or dead radio pile)...I just don't want to be up to my neck in more prototypes before I finally get a good one. Seriously thinking of skipping it and building a simple DC or superhet. I don't know. But for much of their life, they have been treated as simple receivers. First in the twenties or so, when things were expensive so it was as minimal as possible. In more recent decades, because they were seen as a beginner item, an alternative to a complicated superhet. Simple is bound to mean tradeoffs. Realistically they are oscillators, yet how often is the care put into them that someone puts into a free running oscillator? A thick piece of wire for the coil, built really strong to avoid microphonics, with temperature compensating capacitors and voltage regulation, just like in a vfo. Add a stage of isolation between the antenna and the detector, just as you'd isolate a vfo from it's load. Bypass it will, instead of saving money by having only one capacitor. Use a good sturdy variable capacitor, rather than the one you got out of the AM portable. If you built an oscillator like most regens are built, would you expect much stability? One of the neat things about solid state is that the cost of extra active components is virtually nill, in terms of actual price and in terms of space. You're not blowing the food budget to buy that single tube so you can try out the receiver you built. Look at Charles Kitchins work. Unlike when solid state first came along, he went back to the basics, read up on the early articles about regeneration, and then proceeded to try to make them better in solid state form. So you see that extra stage to isolate the detector from the antenna. You see a voltage regulator. And it will still be cheaper than that single tube receiver in the old days. I've never built a regen, but the things he puts in his receivers were things I had been thinking about if I'd wanted to build a good regen. Michael VE2BVW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA unbuilt p-box shortwave regen receiver | Swap | |||
FA: LAFAYETTE KT-135 "EXPLOR-AIR" REGEN SW RECEIVER | Equipment | |||
FA: LAFAYETTE KT-135 "EXPLOR-AIR" REGEN SW RECEIVER | Equipment | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
FA Globe Patrol Regen Receiver | Swap |