Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Thanks, JEFF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
Hi, Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Thanks, JEFF As far as I know, 7MHz is on the border between using one mix or the other. You'll see different Q's because details of winding, wire choice and mounting will affect Q, as would use of a core from another manufacturer (I don't know if anyone other than MicroMetals uses that system, but if they did I wouldn't count on it being standardized). If you're not going to be hitting it with really high power and if you don't need it to be highly resonant I wouldn't worry too much. If you're going for an engineered solution then you should make a number of "identical" coils and test them; just make sure that the coils you make are representative of what you'll be manufacturing. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jeff" wrote: Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Either grade 2 or 6 should work fine at 7 and 14 MHz. The Al values differ somewhat, so the number of turns to get a given inductance will be a little higher for grade 6 than grade 2. You only need to confirm that the number of turns required will actually fit on your T68-size core. For a given number of turns, the unloaded Q does peak at one frequency but is still quite good on either side of that frequency. Unless you have some real need to achieve the highest possible Q for a given inductance at the frequency of interest, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Wind the toroids, build the filter, and see how it works out! -- Joe |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff wrote: Hi, Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Having just been playing with Micrometals cores myself, I gather that -2 is indeed the 'best' for higher frequencies. The local distributor says it's stocked in greater depth too. Have you also looked at Magnetics Inc and Arnold ? Graham |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Jeff, wrote:
Hi, Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Not that this is an exact science but typically I switch from #2 to #6 around 10MHz. But I never design with high Q because that can be a pain in production. Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get a copy of Amidon's catalog which gives detailed suggestions for powdered
iron and ferrite materials, based on many years of experience. www.amidoncorp.com Bill W0IYH "Jeff" wrote in message ... Hi, Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Thanks, JEFF |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:47:56 +1300, "Jeff"
wrote: Hi, Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Thanks, http://www.micrometals.com/ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the suggestions. Ive got some Amidon T68-6 toroids to wind
up, and will test the completed filter on a spectrum analyser next week. JEFF "Jeff" wrote in message ... Hi, Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Thanks, JEFF |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Jeff" on Tues, Oct 11 2005 2:47 pm
Im confused regarding the choice of iron powder toroid for a 7Mhz high pass filter. I need to use a small size (T68) toroid. For the freq range, some reference texts say T68-2 is the one, others say T68-6" grade. I see differing "best Q range" specs for the 6 grade.....2-30Mhz......10-50Mhz...etc. Have similar need for 20Mhz LPF, but assume "6" is really the choice there. Any suggestions as to the relative differences and reasons to choose between grades 2 and 6 for the HPF in T68 size? Been there, done that. In the practical case, what you can expect is a very slight change in insertion loss in the passband, perhaps a less sharp transition of attenuation at cutoff, depending on the type of highpass. It can be modeled in any SPICE analysis program with accuracy if you make a special model that adds a series R element computed from reactance divided by Q. For a highpass filter, the usual filter type has the inductor in shunt. In that configuration the inductor has a reactance directly proportional to frequency and will have little effect on the insertion loss in the passband. The equivalent series R due to Q won't matter much at 1/3 to 1/4 the cutoff frequency. It might matter on attenuation in the stopband region but the analysis on that is more difficult and a practical build-and-measure is the quicker way to go. For a lowpass filter, the usual configuration has inductors in series and there the Q of the inductors will affect insertion loss more. Those would use the lower frequency range for powder mix. In a highpass filter it is important that the capacitors have a minimum series inductance so that the 5x to 10x cutoff frequency isn't disturbed. Since capacitors are usually in series, their Q will effect the insertion loss. Fortunately, most capacitors will have a good Q up around 500+ and won't be a factor. Use what you have and measure the results (you've got a spectrum analyzer handy so that's taken care of). I made a fairly good, practical Synthesis-Analysis program for L-C filters that includes automatic modeling of (separately) all capacitor Qs and inductor Qs. I can attach that to private mail if you want it. Freeware. Proven by practical test comparison. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello William,
Get a copy of Amidon's catalog which gives detailed suggestions for powdered iron and ferrite materials, based on many years of experience. www.amidoncorp.com Absolutely. I literally wore one of those catalogs to the point where you could see through several pages. Then there are the ARRL Handbook and their Antenna Book. Both well worth every penny. Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT- The Five Iron | CB | |||
PRO-95 good choice? | Scanner | |||
Iron powder vs. ferrite cores for low-power inductors | Homebrew | |||
Iron powder vs. ferrite cores for low-power inductors | Homebrew |