Huh? The LT1763 claims 20uVRMS noise in a 100kHz bandwidth. That's
about 63nV/rtHz. The data sheets shows it MUCH worse at low
frequencies, and the LT1964 a bit worse yet. I'm not sure who Wetzel
is, but the (modified) Wenzel circuit I've used has given me noise down
in the very few nanovolts/rtHz region down to 10Hz and below, depending
on just how I implement it. Perhaps we're thinking of different
circuits for cleaning supplies. The one I'm thinking of is very useful
even with "quiet" regulators like the LT parts. Easy implementations
get you 20dB improvement in noise, and careful design and parts
specification can get you 40dB, with noise as low as a couple nV/rtHz
and a 1/f corner well below 100Hz, by using an op amp like the AD797
and low noise precision resistors in what is essentially a bridge
circuit to cancel the regulator noise.

Guess the jury is still out on the multiple bypass cap values, too.
Xilinx and TI at least both recommend -- strongly recommend -- multiple
values. Yes, you want to avoid resonances, but I've had much less
trouble with bypass caps in parallel than with chokes resonating with
with bypass caps. Now that's something to look out for! The trick
with parallel bypass caps is to insure that the Q of any parasitic
inductances is low.

Cheers,
Tom