LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old April 1st 06, 03:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
jack
 
Posts: n/a
Default Chokes on digital supplies

Yes, you are right -- my recollection was faulty and I apologize.

I was just looking at the "clean up" portion of the Wenzel (not Wetzel)
regulator with an LM317 -- later on in the article (Finesse Voltage
Regulator Noise) they use an LM833 which is cited as a limiting factor.

Jung used an AD797 in the Super-Regulator series of articles, but I believe
that they switched to an AD817 or AD825 later on as there were some
problems. The Jung article can be found on EDN's website:
www.ednmag.com -- Just put "Jung" in the search engine. Some people
reported that the Jung super-regulator could be made to oscillate pretty
easily. I didn't have this problem.

I built the super-regulator and used it with a low noise preamp, but found
the Linear Parts to be much easier to implement, as long as I used a
tantalum bypass !

"K7ITM" wrote in message
ups.com...
Huh? The LT1763 claims 20uVRMS noise in a 100kHz bandwidth. That's
about 63nV/rtHz. The data sheets shows it MUCH worse at low
frequencies, and the LT1964 a bit worse yet. I'm not sure who Wetzel
is, but the (modified) Wenzel circuit I've used has given me noise down
in the very few nanovolts/rtHz region down to 10Hz and below, depending
on just how I implement it. Perhaps we're thinking of different
circuits for cleaning supplies. The one I'm thinking of is very useful
even with "quiet" regulators like the LT parts. Easy implementations
get you 20dB improvement in noise, and careful design and parts
specification can get you 40dB, with noise as low as a couple nV/rtHz
and a 1/f corner well below 100Hz, by using an op amp like the AD797
and low noise precision resistors in what is essentially a bridge
circuit to cancel the regulator noise.

Guess the jury is still out on the multiple bypass cap values, too.
Xilinx and TI at least both recommend -- strongly recommend -- multiple
values. Yes, you want to avoid resonances, but I've had much less
trouble with bypass caps in parallel than with chokes resonating with
with bypass caps. Now that's something to look out for! The trick
with parallel bypass caps is to insure that the Q of any parasitic
inductances is low.

Cheers,
Tom



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital radio sales surge past 1m mark Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 January 21st 05 10:31 PM
What about digital radio? Hal Rosser Antenna 1 July 31st 04 09:34 AM
Digital scanners online...Listen now ! bla Scanner 3 November 24th 03 07:53 AM
HP 6129C 6130C Digital Voltage Source Supplies John Walton Homebrew 0 August 5th 03 07:49 PM
HP 6129C 6130C Digital Voltage Source Supplies John Walton Homebrew 0 August 5th 03 07:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017