Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, you are right -- my recollection was faulty and I apologize.
I was just looking at the "clean up" portion of the Wenzel (not Wetzel) regulator with an LM317 -- later on in the article (Finesse Voltage Regulator Noise) they use an LM833 which is cited as a limiting factor. Jung used an AD797 in the Super-Regulator series of articles, but I believe that they switched to an AD817 or AD825 later on as there were some problems. The Jung article can be found on EDN's website: www.ednmag.com -- Just put "Jung" in the search engine. Some people reported that the Jung super-regulator could be made to oscillate pretty easily. I didn't have this problem. I built the super-regulator and used it with a low noise preamp, but found the Linear Parts to be much easier to implement, as long as I used a tantalum bypass ! "K7ITM" wrote in message ups.com... Huh? The LT1763 claims 20uVRMS noise in a 100kHz bandwidth. That's about 63nV/rtHz. The data sheets shows it MUCH worse at low frequencies, and the LT1964 a bit worse yet. I'm not sure who Wetzel is, but the (modified) Wenzel circuit I've used has given me noise down in the very few nanovolts/rtHz region down to 10Hz and below, depending on just how I implement it. Perhaps we're thinking of different circuits for cleaning supplies. The one I'm thinking of is very useful even with "quiet" regulators like the LT parts. Easy implementations get you 20dB improvement in noise, and careful design and parts specification can get you 40dB, with noise as low as a couple nV/rtHz and a 1/f corner well below 100Hz, by using an op amp like the AD797 and low noise precision resistors in what is essentially a bridge circuit to cancel the regulator noise. Guess the jury is still out on the multiple bypass cap values, too. Xilinx and TI at least both recommend -- strongly recommend -- multiple values. Yes, you want to avoid resonances, but I've had much less trouble with bypass caps in parallel than with chokes resonating with with bypass caps. Now that's something to look out for! The trick with parallel bypass caps is to insure that the Q of any parasitic inductances is low. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Digital radio sales surge past 1m mark | Broadcasting | |||
What about digital radio? | Antenna | |||
Digital scanners online...Listen now ! | Scanner | |||
HP 6129C 6130C Digital Voltage Source Supplies | Homebrew | |||
HP 6129C 6130C Digital Voltage Source Supplies | Homebrew |