Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
There is a coil. It is 1" in diameter. It is 2" long. It has 20 turns. How accurately can coil Q be determined at 30 MHz? (1) Using an Autec antenna analyser? (2) Using the best commercially available instrument. Those are good questions, although not particularly germane to the current discussion. A toroid is much easier to measure than an air core inductor with fair accuracy, since the field is largely confined. What makes solenoidal coils relatively difficult is the problem of avoiding coupling to the measuring device and nearby objects. I'll mention again that ferrites are most commonly used at RF for wideband transformers, baluns, and EMI suppression. In those applications, Q is typically very low (1 or less) and generally immaterial. To answer the question, though, I first note that your program predicts a Q of about 500 for this coil, with a Z of about 960 ohms and an ESR of about 1.4 ohms at 30 MHz. If it's correct, an antenna analyzer would be poor choice for measuring it for several reasons -- poor accuracy at that high an impedance, poor resolution of the ESR, and residual resistance in the measuring device. So probably +/- 50% would be wishful thinking. On the other hand, a good Q meter might make 20% if you could get the coil far enough away from the fixture, and I could probably do around 30% with my GR impedance bridge. But what's the point you're trying to make? Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... | Policy | |||
WTB Really Skinny Whip Material for 1/4 wave two meter | Antenna | |||
Toroid! Toroid! Toroid! | Antenna | |||
Question about toroid vs. air core coil. | Homebrew | |||
Roger Wiseman material | Policy |