Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote
Rod Speed wrote Is one transmit and the other receive? Or are they both transmit and receive? They're normally both transmit and receive. That's a shame. Here in Israel we are limited to 100mw EIRP, which severly limits the transmit antenna. There is NO limitation on the receive antenna. A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod Speed wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote Rod Speed wrote Is one transmit and the other receive? Or are they both transmit and receive? They're normally both transmit and receive. That's a shame. Here in Israel we are limited to 100mw EIRP, which severly limits the transmit antenna. There is NO limitation on the receive antenna. A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. Actually, when properly matched, it radiates half the received power. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John - KD5YI" wrote in message news:XLQrg.2896$bd4.372@trnddc01...
Rod Speed wrote: A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. Actually, when properly matched, it radiates half the received power. How do you get that? If the receiver input impedance is matched to the antenna, all the received power is absorbed. There is no reflection. There is no radiation. If the receiver matching is for optimal noise figure, there may be some reflection and reradiation, but there's nothing pinning it to be half the received power. Don |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don K wrote:
"John - KD5YI" wrote in message news:XLQrg.2896$bd4.372@trnddc01... Rod Speed wrote: A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. Actually, when properly matched, it radiates half the received power. How do you get that? If the receiver input impedance is matched to the antenna, all the received power is absorbed. There is no reflection. There is no radiation. If the receiver matching is for optimal noise figure, there may be some reflection and reradiation, but there's nothing pinning it to be half the received power. John is correct. A receiving antenna, when matched, reradiates half the power it receives. An impinging field induces current in the antenna. This causes radiation, just like the current in a transmitting antenna. As it turns out, when the antenna is matched, the amount of power radiated equals the amount of power delivered to the load, and that's the best you can do. If you'd like a more in-depth and mathematical explanation, you can find it in any antenna text, often discussed as "scattering". If a receiving antenna did absorb all the impinging power, it would be a lot easier to make a shield or a stealth aircraft. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote
Don K wrote John - KD5YI wrote Rod Speed wrote A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. Actually, when properly matched, it radiates half the received power. How do you get that? If the receiver input impedance is matched to the antenna, all the received power is absorbed. There is no reflection. There is no radiation. If the receiver matching is for optimal noise figure, there may be some reflection and reradiation, but there's nothing pinning it to be half the received power. John is correct. Nope. A receiving antenna, when matched, reradiates half the power it receives. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. An impinging field induces current in the antenna. This causes radiation, just like the current in a transmitting antenna. As it turns out, when the antenna is matched, the amount of power radiated equals the amount of power delivered to the load, and that's the best you can do. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. If you'd like a more in-depth and mathematical explanation, you can find it in any antenna text, often discussed as "scattering". Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. If a receiving antenna did absorb all the impinging power, it would be a lot easier to make a shield or a stealth aircraft. Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod Speed wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote Don K wrote John - KD5YI wrote Rod Speed wrote A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. Actually, when properly matched, it radiates half the received power. How do you get that? If the receiver input impedance is matched to the antenna, all the received power is absorbed. There is no reflection. There is no radiation. If the receiver matching is for optimal noise figure, there may be some reflection and reradiation, but there's nothing pinning it to be half the received power. John is correct. Nope. A receiving antenna, when matched, reradiates half the power it receives. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. An impinging field induces current in the antenna. This causes radiation, just like the current in a transmitting antenna. As it turns out, when the antenna is matched, the amount of power radiated equals the amount of power delivered to the load, and that's the best you can do. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. If you'd like a more in-depth and mathematical explanation, you can find it in any antenna text, often discussed as "scattering". Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. If a receiving antenna did absorb all the impinging power, it would be a lot easier to make a shield or a stealth aircraft. Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. Always amazinmg how when some people are proven wrong, the revert to the "Is NOT, IS NOT," type of argument used by small children, then when that doesn't work, the argument becomes irrelevant. Rod, I suggest you LEARN something from your intellectual and technical betters BEFORE you show the world your ignorance. John |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John L. Sielke wrote:
Rod Speed wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote Don K wrote John - KD5YI wrote Rod Speed wrote A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. Actually, when properly matched, it radiates half the received power. How do you get that? If the receiver input impedance is matched to the antenna, all the received power is absorbed. There is no reflection. There is no radiation. If the receiver matching is for optimal noise figure, there may be some reflection and reradiation, but there's nothing pinning it to be half the received power. John is correct. Nope. A receiving antenna, when matched, reradiates half the power it receives. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. An impinging field induces current in the antenna. This causes radiation, just like the current in a transmitting antenna. As it turns out, when the antenna is matched, the amount of power radiated equals the amount of power delivered to the load, and that's the best you can do. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. If you'd like a more in-depth and mathematical explanation, you can find it in any antenna text, often discussed as "scattering". Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. If a receiving antenna did absorb all the impinging power, it would be a lot easier to make a shield or a stealth aircraft. Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. Always amazinmg how when some people are proven wrong, the revert to the "Is NOT, IS NOT," type of argument used by small children, then when that doesn't work, the argument becomes irrelevant. Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag. Rod, I suggest you LEARN something from your intellectual and technical betters BEFORE you show the world your ignorance. Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag. While your original was technically correct, its completely irrelevant to what was actually being discussed, WHETHER THE RECEIVE ANTENNA EVER RADIATES ENOUGH TO BE RELEVANT TO THE EIRP RESTRICTION. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod Speed wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote Don K wrote John - KD5YI wrote Rod Speed wrote A receive antenna has no EIRP, it doesnt radiate any real power. Actually, when properly matched, it radiates half the received power. How do you get that? If the receiver input impedance is matched to the antenna, all the received power is absorbed. There is no reflection. There is no radiation. If the receiver matching is for optimal noise figure, there may be some reflection and reradiation, but there's nothing pinning it to be half the received power. John is correct. Nope. A receiving antenna, when matched, reradiates half the power it receives. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. An impinging field induces current in the antenna. This causes radiation, just like the current in a transmitting antenna. As it turns out, when the antenna is matched, the amount of power radiated equals the amount of power delivered to the load, and that's the best you can do. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. If you'd like a more in-depth and mathematical explanation, you can find it in any antenna text, often discussed as "scattering". Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. If a receiving antenna did absorb all the impinging power, it would be a lot easier to make a shield or a stealth aircraft. Not relevant to the original point, any effect on the EIRP restriction. Always amazinmg how when some people are proven wrong, the revert to the "Is NOT, IS NOT," type of argument used by small children, then when that doesn't work, the argument becomes irrelevant. Rod, I suggest you LEARN something from your intellectual and technical betters BEFORE you show the world your ignorance. John |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod Speed wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote . . . A receiving antenna, when matched, reradiates half the power it receives. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. . . . It's real power, but that power all comes from the impinging field; it's not contributing any new power. So you're right that the EIRP restriction doesn't apply. The receive antenna reduces the amount of power in the field by the amount delivered to the antenna's termination, plus any losses along the way. The intent of the EIRP restriction is to limit the amount of field strength added by a transmitter. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Rod Speed wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote . . . A receiving antenna, when matched, reradiates half the power it receives. Yes but that ISNT ANY REAL POWER in the EIRP restriction sense. It's real power, Yes, BUT NOT IN THE EIRP RESTRICTION SENSE. but that power all comes from the impinging field; it's not contributing any new power. So you're right that the EIRP restriction doesn't apply. And that is what was being discussed when John made such a spectacular fool of himself mindlessly rabbiting on about what is no news to anyone with a clue about receiving antennas. The receive antenna reduces the amount of power in the field by the amount delivered to the antenna's termination, plus any losses along the way. The intent of the EIRP restriction is to limit the amount of field strength added by a transmitter. Duh. So John was mindlessly rabbiting on about a complete irrelevancy WHEN THE EIRP RESTRICTION WAS BEING DISCUSSED. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1st Responder Wireless Acquires TAC 9 Paging | Scanner | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #719 | General | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Extending range of wireless motion sensor | Antenna | |||
Extend range of wireless motion sensor | Antenna |