| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
AF6AY wrote:
You'll pardon me for only picking one part of your article to discuss. Then I would say that the old, out-dated stereotypical "we are the heroes of disasters and emergencies" bragging ought to be put away. While I do agree that some of the material that comes out of disasters is overblown, sometimes people do *earn* the right to brag. When folks put a lot of hours into helping out in disasters they deserve recognition. Why is it so bad to highlight a positive aspect of the hobby? It's not the *only* aspect of the hobby, but hams still do help in disasters. It's one of the few things that we do that the general public can actually relate to. How do you get the general public excited about the thrill of snagging a rare DX station or working your 100th country or even building a radio? But people relate to cell phones that don't work and hams' ability to communicate in those conditions. The fact that cell phones are more reliable these days and hams' capabilities are not needed as often doesn't diminish the message. The public that has been IN such events is aware of who helped them and who didn't. They might have an idea what *agency* helped them. But the public has no particular awareness of the infrastructure that facilitated that help. They might understand that a Red Cross feeding vehicle provided them a meal; they don't understand or care how that crew communicated with their headquarters. With Katrina, the Red Cross found itself with 200+ shelters and no communications with them. Hams helped. Did the people in the shelters know that? In most cases they did not, as there was no reason for them to care how the communications were accomplished. Don't get me wrong . . . I'm not saying that every ham needs to participate in emergency communications, or that hams are the major players in every disaster. But in spite of the great strides that have been made in making the communications infrastructure more robust, Mother Nature can still throw a sufficiently hard punch to cause severe disruption, and ham radio operators do still play a role in such situations. If the hobby can benefit from accurate, well-written accounts of those activities, what's wrong with that? It's something good that real people do with their real time and resources, and they should get real recognition for it. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 60 Days Since Code Test Cessation Compared | Policy | |||
| what Code testing realy does to the ARS | Policy | |||
| what Code testing realy does to the ARS | Antenna | |||
| what Code testing realy does to the ARS | Swap | |||