Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Popular Is/Was Amateur Radio
On May 7, 10:45 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
An activity like ham radio is going to have its ups and downs. It will ebb and flow. These variations can last several years so are hard to evaluate. Dee, N8UZE According to the figures that the OP posted here and in other threads (no reason to doubt them) ham radio has had steady "ups" with no "downs" to a high in 2003. Then in just the past 4 years (2003-2007) the number of "hams/1000 population" has fallen to BELOW the ratio of 1990. In other words, after //many\\ UNBROKEN DECADES of rising popularity, in just //4 years since 2003\\ we have shed the gains of the previous 13 years and continue to head south. Calling that "ebb and flow" is, in my opinion, a bad case of 'whistling past the grave yard'. The fellow in another thread talking about the 'last generation' may be onto something. 73, RDW |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How Popular Is/Was Amateur Radio
On May 7, 9:39�pm, RDWeaver wrote:
On May 7, 10:45 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote: An activity like ham radio is going to have its ups and downs. It will ebb and flow. These variations can last several years so are hard to evaluate. Dee, N8UZE According to the figures that the OP posted here and in other threads (no reason to doubt them) ham radio has had steady "ups" with no "downs" to a high in 2003. Not exactly. In the mid 1960s the growth stalled while the US population grew rapidly. The percentage of the population that were hams went *down* during the decade of the 1960s. Compare 1960 to 1970 in terms of hams-per-1000 and see. If you look at the annual numbers from 1965 to 1975 the total went down some years and up others. Then in just the past 4 years (2003-2007) the number of "hams/1000 population" has fallen to BELOW the ratio of 1990. Yup. Think about *why* that would happen, even though the license requirements were reduced in 2000 and again in 2007. In other words, after //many\\ UNBROKEN DECADES of rising popularity, in just //4 years since 2003\\ we have shed the gains of the previous 13 years and continue to head south. Not really. The 1960s were a down decade. That means 3 decades of rising popularity (1970s/1980s/1990s) Calling that "ebb and flow" is, in my opinion, a bad case of 'whistling past the grave yard'. Well, what do you think is really happening? The fellow in another thread talking about the 'last generation' may be onto something. One thing that has changed greatly in my 40 years as a ham is the age of a typical newcomer. I'm not saying that's good or bad, just that it happened. In the 1960s, when I became a ham, and well into the 1970s, most of the newcomers I encountered were teenagers or twentysomethings. But as the 70s went on, more and more new amateurs were in their 30s, 40s, and older. In particular, during those decades I saw more and more people taking up amateur radio as a retirement or empty-nest activity. There were still plenty of teenagers and even preteens becoming hams then - and still are. But the percentages shifted. When I was a new ham in 1967, it was a safe bet that if I met an amateur who was 10 or more years older, that amateur had been a ham longer than me. But by 1980 I often encountered hams who were older than me but hadn't been licensed nearly as long. One of the great things about amateur radio is that it's about as close to a life-long activity as you can get, and people of almost all ages can become hams. But as more and more people are first-licensed later in life, their time as amateurs grows shorter, and the turnover increases. That's just one factor of many. The change in license term, changes in the typical American family, changes in where people live and work, and many other factors all combine to change the numbers. In a previous post I wrote of the "honeydew hams" (which may be an East Coast term) who got licenses for personal-communications purposes in the days before cell phones were inexpensive and ubiquitous. Whatever you call them, there were lots of 'em entering ham radio 30, 20, even 15 years ago. Today there are almost none - cell phones do the job 99% of the time. Plenty of other examples. None of that means amateur radio is dying or that we are the last generation. Rather it means amateur radio is changing - as it always has. Most of the reason to become a ham today is because someone is interested in 'radio for its own sake' - an end in itself, not a means to another end. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How Popular Is/Was Amateur Radio | General | |||
How Popular is CB radio in Australia...... what's taken it's place ? | CB | |||
FA: Assorted older Amateur Radio,73 Mag,Popular Communications Mags | Swap |