| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Horne wrote on Tues 6 May 2008 00:54
AF6AY wrote: I said we were a trained corps of "_operators_", not just CW operators. I know that military radios almost always use voice: I ran the Navy MARS station at Danang in 1971 and 1972. I got the job because I had a ham license and I was there, and the unit commander cared about what I could _do_, not what my MOS was. The Military Affiliate Radio System was never a part of the tactical or strategic radio communications effort/network/system within the US military since it began (under another name) in pre-WWII US Army. It was generally considered to be a Public Relations activity akin to Special Services functions such as the AFRS (later changed to AFRTS, Armed Forces Radio and Television Service) or the Special Service traveling sports teams. Those of us who did the 24/7 grunt work of keeping all units communicating with one another did not consider MARS to be 'great.' None of us 24/7 grunt communicators required any federal license to do our jobs. FWIW, CW still came in handy on a couple of occasions: when signals dropped too low for phone patches, I could slide the KWM-2A down to the ham band and operate "maritime mobile" on CW to get health-and-welfare traffic through. One occasion I remember involved a seaman with a pregnant wife who was headed home on emergency leave due to complications of some kind: I'll never forget the look on his face when I read him the reply to the "ARL Two, ARL Nineteen" priority message I had sent minutes before - "Your wife and newborn son both OK congratulations dad". FWIW, I can relate a similar tale. The 250-TTY torn-tape relay floor at ADA Control had many operators on each shift. Each was assigned a group of circuits. TTY tape was chadless, both punched and printed. Red Cross and other agencies got lowest priority handling after the start of the 'radio day' (about 2 AM local time). One TTY operator spotted a message to another on his shift. He showed the tape to his friend who was overjoyed at the news that he was now a newborn father. Red Cross people wanted to pass the message to recipient in person. New father blurted out "I already knew it." That sparked a lot of indignity to the officials who only thought of 'procedure' and 'order of things.' He was reported to his company commander. CO was caught in a bind, being good to his men but also having to play politics with higher officials. I did some mild pleading of his case, suggesting Company Punishment (similar to Captain's Mast in USN). CO caught the drift and, knowing I had been scheduled as CQ (Charge of Quarters) that night, remanded his 'punishment' to me to handle while on CQ. Newborn father was still feeling good despite being chewed out so his 'punishment' was largely to keep me from falling asleep while on the 5 PM to 8 AM next-day CQ period. NO MARS involvement there, none needed. BTW, a military purchased Collins KWM-2 is the AN/FRC-93 and is the commercial version with all crystals, not limited to amateur radio bands (of 1975). There's an FRC-93 TM on the Internet, PDF size of about 6 MB. I have one. It is essentially the technical manual written, produced by Collins. In three years of my assignment with ADA in the Army, there was only ONE day of a two-hour total radio blackout on HF in 1955. Minimum RF power output at ADA was 1 KW on HF. That is only 10 db higher than typical ham radio HF transmitters. All operations were 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and remained that way until 1963 when Army downsizing had all ops transferred to USAF, equipment, sites and all. USAF gave it all up with sites, buildings given to the Japanese in 1978. That was 30 years ago. AF6AY |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 7 May 2008 00:07:53 EDT, AF6AY wrote:
None of us 24/7 grunt communicators required any federal license to do our jobs. You've been saying that for years, Len. It's disingenuous at best. It's accurate to say that none of you had to have an _FCC_ license to do your job. In reality, the "Federal license" that was required was the assignment to your job by military superiors - who could yank you out of there for any reason, real or imagined, effectively 'canceling" that "license". At least the FCC has to hold a hearing at which you can defend yourself. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon e-mail: k2asp [at] arrl [dot] net |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Differences Between Two of the Same Radio | Shortwave | |||
| Differences Between Two of the Same Radio | Shortwave | |||
| Differences between Hammarlund 170 and 180 | Boatanchors | |||
| Heath SB-101 and 102 differences? | Equipment | |||
| Drake T-4C vs T-4XC differences | Boatanchors | |||