Slow Code wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote in
ps.com:


Lloyd Daugherty wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

Slow Code wrote:
This could get interesting.

Sc
they will do neither...

They will do both ...

I don't think so, The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts,
they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do.
They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the
Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a
license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time
of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the
FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS". I also know people
in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are
asking the same question. You see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot
more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to
go the courts to explain themselves.

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB



ROFLMAO

They don't have to explain anything, you'll be the one to have to explain
to them that you're sorry for the pirating with excessive power levels and
that you promise never to do it again.

SC

come from some dumbass ham operator who don't the law, I'm not going to
comment...and besides what if I am?? Why the hell should I waste my
time to apply for a license?? HELL I applied seven times and dumbass,
THEY will have to explain themselves, but hey your a stupid ham who
probably jacks off with a picture with stebie in hand and don't know
****!!

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB

N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...:
Lloyd Daugherty wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

Slow Code wrote:
This could get interesting.

Sc
they will do neither...

They will do both ...

I don't think so...(SNIP)

So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore
my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared
to silence you.

Oooooooooooooooops!

The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts,
they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do.

Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just
fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation
particulars.

They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the
Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a
license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time
of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the
FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS".

YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS!

YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME!

YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE!

I also know people
in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are
asking the same question.

Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your
freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over
and over and over........

you see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot
more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to
go the courts to explain themselves.

There's nothing for them to "explain", except to answer WHY it
took so long to cuff you!

Todd N9OGL
SMEGMA SCUM RADIO

Here's your buddy MORKIE making a fool out of himself...thought
you two would like to keep close company!

Message-ID: .com

KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy"

There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy!

Quoted Word For Word!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...:
Lloyd Daugherty wrote:
On 8 Sep 2006 11:27:29 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

Slow Code wrote:
This could get interesting.

Sc
they will do neither...

They will do both ...

I don't think so...(SNIP)

So much for what YOU think...You ALSO said your ISP would ignore
my complaints since you were such a big wheel in town and no one dared
to silence you.

Oooooooooooooooops!

The FCC wouldn't want this to go the federal courts,
they have to explain themselves, which they (the FCC) don't want to do.

Sure they will! And it will probably be some GS-5 clerk that just
fills in the blanks of some standardized form with your violation
particulars.

They will have to explain why they lied all these years about the
Waivering process and why a person who applied seven times for a
license didn't get a license and why the FCC didn't even take the time
of day to consider that persons waiver (the Federal courts has told the
FCC repeatively that "THEY MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS".

YOU DIDN'T MEET THE REQUIREMENTS!

Prove it!!!

YOU DIDN'T FILE IN TIME!

Waiver can be filed at any time 47 CFR 1.3 and the courts has stated
that they must consider waivers even if their not filed during a filing
window.


YOU WERE NOT QUALIFIED TO BE A COMMISSION LICENSEE!


What's your excuse then steve??? The abusive behavior due to your
mental illness on here has proven to me and I think a few others you
should be a licensee either.

I also know people
in the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications (the FCC boss) who are
asking the same question.

Your illegal use of an HF frequency has NOTHING to do with your
freedom of speech, PutzBoy! The FCC's won that argument over and over
and over and over........

So, the point is steve, why should a person continue to apply for a
license and waiver if the FCC isn't going to consider it, I mean that
is what the courts has stated made the licensing process legal.

you see this isn't like K1MAN, there is a lot
more too it then what you know.....and the FCC doesn't want to have to
go the courts to explain themselves.

There's nothing for them to "explain", except to answer WHY it
took so long to cuff you!

Todd N9OGL
SMEGMA SCUM RADIO

Here's your buddy MORKIE making a fool out of himself...thought
you two would like to keep close company!

Message-ID: .com

KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy"

There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy!

Quoted Word For Word!

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...:
stop the lying

if you have a point engage in deabte civl deabte would be nice but we
don't expect miracles

I've engaged the "points". Morkie. You and Toiddie are the ones
with sewer-mouth responses, ergo the "civil debate" deficiencies are
YOURS.

try being merely rude for a start

That's your schtick, Morkie...I'll let you wield it.

and start telling the truth

I haven't stopped.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 20 Sep 2006 11:12:56 -0700, "
wrote:


K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote, and thereby made a fool out of himself...:
stop the lying

if you have a point engage in deabte civl deabte would be nice but we
don't expect miracles

try being merely rude for a start

and start telling the truth
stop the lying steve


Why does Morkie keep insisting that I am "lying" when all I am
doing is quoting HIM verbatim?

I'm not lying, Morkie...

Here's YOUR words AGAIN, Morkie:

Message ID .com

KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy"

There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy!

Quoted Word For Word!

Steve, K4YZ