Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 6th 06, 11:43 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Default Code, for SC

I have an idea. This should thin the ranks of amateurs and let Big Brother
have the bands as is desired. We all know the FCC wants to sell the bands to
the highest bidder. In addition to the code requirement, lets have
proficiency testing in SSB, FM, RTTY, PSK-31 and Packet. That should just
about kill the code proponents off, as they are mostly too old, addled, and
unable to learn. That way, even they won't be able to use *their* bands
without these proficiencies.

Sounds like a plan, eh?

HTH


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 7th 06, 01:10 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default Code, for SC


"U-Know-Who" wrote in message
...
I have an idea. This should thin the ranks of amateurs and let Big Brother
have the bands as is desired. We all know the FCC wants to sell the bands
to the highest bidder. In addition to the code requirement, lets have
proficiency testing in SSB, FM, RTTY, PSK-31 and Packet. That should just
about kill the code proponents off, as they are mostly too old, addled, and
unable to learn. That way, even they won't be able to use *their* bands
without these proficiencies.

Sounds like a plan, eh?

HTH



And just who do you think developed these modes? How new do you think these
modes are? It seems like everyone I contact on the "new" mode of PSK31 is
retired and has been for many years.



  #3   Report Post  
Old October 7th 06, 01:30 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default Code, for SC

Dee Flint wrote:



And just who do you think developed these modes? How new do you think these
modes are? It seems like everyone I contact on the "new" mode of PSK31 is
retired and has been for many years.

sample check Dee: how many people that you contact on ANY mode are not
retired and have been for years

went to our Radio meeting tues night and a talk was given on the "New"
mode PSK-31

if your sample is skewed towrd retirees as badly as mine........

  #4   Report Post  
Old October 7th 06, 01:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Code, for SC

"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:

I have an idea. This should thin the ranks of amateurs and let Big
Brother have the bands as is desired. We all know the FCC wants to sell
the bands to the highest bidder. In addition to the code requirement,
lets have proficiency testing in SSB, FM, RTTY, PSK-31 and Packet. That
should just about kill the code proponents off, as they are mostly too
old, addled, and unable to learn. That way, even they won't be able to
use *their* bands without these proficiencies.

Sounds like a plan, eh?

HTH





I could go for that.

The more testing, the better. Then outsiders would look at the amateur
radio service and see valuable and capable operators, they would see our
spectrum wasn't being wasted by people that only know how to talk into a
microphone to communicate.

Thanks. :-) Great idea.

SC
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 7th 06, 01:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Default when you going to stop welching on your bets SC?


wrote in message
...
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:32:05 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

when you going to stop welching on your bets SC?
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Stop hijacking threads, you idiot.




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 7th 06, 01:45 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default when you going to stop welching on your bets SC?

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:32:05 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

when you going to stop welching on your bets SC?
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Stop hijacking threads, you idiot.

not hijacking them myself Sc hijacked them

  #7   Report Post  
Old October 7th 06, 10:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Mark, You're a retard. when you going to stop welching on your bets SC?

"an old friend" wrote in
ups.com:

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:32:05 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

when you going to stop welching on your bets SC?
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Stop hijacking threads, you idiot.


not hijacking them myself Sc hijacked them



Mark,

You provide nothing useful to the internet, you're a retard. If you were
intelligent enough to post something someone could agree with or argue with
you about, things would be different, but all your retarded ass can do is
cut & paste one line mis-spelled babble, you contribute nothing to the
group so you should keep your dumb-ass mouth shut until you have something
useful to say. People may disagree with me on whether or not to keep CW,
but at least it's discussion. Your posts are mindless retard cut & paste
babble.

I get teased and forged by K4YZ and others too. I read the posts and have
a good laugh, I don't need to follow up to them. You're too retarded to
understand that and that's why they keep teasing your dumb ass.

From this point on anyone that teases your stupid ass has my blessing, I
can understand after this last batch of cut & paste of yours why they do
it. I tried to be as nice to you as I could, but you're just too ****ing
retarded to deal with.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? Dirk Policy 1057 December 21st 06 02:29 PM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Policy 189 December 14th 06 11:46 AM
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 04:50 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 02:12 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017