"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:16:19 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
rthlink.net...
'Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
news:klulj2tcmkejnh69l3blguhf5j5r5u2uop@4ax. com...
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog
wrote:

That was a GREAT post!!!!!!!
she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not
walk the talk
..........

There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due.
why was no coment due?

Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering
to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc


Dee is right.
You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no
class at all.

SC

By the way, I've never referred to any person as being a lesser or lower
class than another.
stop your lying dee flint you chose to refer to 300,00 people as
lessor hams then refuse to apoligize for or even adknowledge why
someone might be offended
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


But they are a lesser class, Mark in the Dark. The more exams you take
and pass, the harder you work, the farther up the ladder you go.

The problem you have Mark, is that you're so lazy people have to slap your
silly ass off the ladder so they can climb up. You're against having good
hams.

SC

As you can see, he is unable to separate license classes from people. I
referred only to the licenses not the people. He seems to think that a
definition of the license is also a definition of the person. That is
absolutely inane. Afterall most of us, including myself, hold a standard
driver's license. It is a lower class license than a chauffer's license,
CDL B, or CDL A. None of us are "insulted" by the fact the we hold a lower
class license.

Dee, N8UZE

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:


"Slow Code" wrote in message

SC

As you can see, he is unable to separate license classes from people.

no you lack that skill I
referred only to the licenses not the people. He seems to think that a
definition of the license is also a definition of the person. That is
absolutely inane. Afterall most of us, including myself, hold a
standard driver's license. It is a lower class license than a
chauffer's license, CDL B, or CDL A. None of us are "insulted" by the
fact the we hold a lower class license.
but you would if also told that your lower class was the result of
being lazy you do not understand the subject of CoNTEXT it is a word
you should try learning


But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to
upgrade. You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses.

SC

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:06:31 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
m:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:



But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to
upgrade.
no I simply can't do it, certainly in the legal sens eof it
You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses.

not at all that you can't understand


I understand enough to know that thousands have passed the code elements,
but now that it looks like ham radio is going to get dumbed down more you
refuse to be a good ham and learn it.

SC

Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone
hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear
about your dead code bull****.
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:51:01 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:06:31 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:



But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to
upgrade.
no I simply can't do it, certainly in the legal sens eof it
You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses.

not at all that you can't understand


I understand enough to know that thousands have passed the code elements,
so? Hilter killed miliions of jew did that make it right?
but now that it looks like ham radio is going to get dumbed down more you
refuse to be a good ham and learn it.
if you are a good ham I'll be a bad one

SC
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Douche Bag" wrote in message
oups.com...
Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone
hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear
about your dead code bull****.
wrote:

Douche, Actually a lot of people do care about CW. There is frequently a
lot of CW activity on the various bands. CW has been my primary operating
mode for the past few years. I have not been at it for 100 years and I am a
hardcore computer geek. CW is just a pleasant change of pace for me.
However, I must agree with you that some of the putzes on this group do need
to get a life -- there actually is more to life (and ham radio) than CW. If
it were not for my growing killfile, the QRM here would be deafening.

Anyone who uses such poor language as that used below is exactly what that
signature implies ... lacking in civility.

Douche Bag wrote:

Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone
hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear
about your dead code bull****.
wrote:

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

if you are a good ham I'll be a bad one


No, Markie in the Darkie, I'm a ham and you aren't.

SC

wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:12:10 -0500, "an old fiend"
wrote:

nope you aint KB9RZX becuase he is me

BBBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote.:
wrote:
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:12:10 -0500, "an old fiend"
wrote:

nope you aint KB9RZX becuase he is me

BBBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I D I O T ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 8 Dec 2006 05:51:21 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

K4YZ wrote.:

now you desperately try to misquote yourself out of context Morkie, I
will conceed that you know two things that I will never know...What
it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's genitals, and the
going welfare rates in Michigan. steve goes claiming

If you pay attention to the attributes, Morkie, you will see that
it appears as if they are YOUR words since you are simply doing
cut-and-pastes in order to keep up with the traffic.

And you CONTINUE to make it clear that your English comprehension
skills are woefully inadequate for a "man" who alledges three college
degrees.

Steve, K4YZ