wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 11:42:55 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:

stop the cyber vandalism

What vandalism?

No lies.

Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan.

that is a lie steve

No it's not.

Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 11:42:55 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:

stop the cyber vandalism

What vandalism?

No lies.

Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan.

that is a lie steve

No it's not.

they you are back to claiming You and I have a sex act together

which is a lie

You're back to proving that you're incompetent in English
comprehension.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 11:52:59 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

they you are back to claiming You and I have a sex act together

which is a lie

You're back to proving that you're incompetent in English
comprehension.

"Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan."

nope steve you said eat you #### of another mans gentials

That's not what I said, fatboy.

I have never eaten YOUR #### therefore your are lying

You've misquoted me AGAIN, fatboy.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 12:00:22 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 11:52:59 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

they you are back to claiming You and I have a sex act together

which is a lie

You're back to proving that you're incompetent in English
comprehension.

"Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan."

nope steve you said eat you #### of another mans gentials

That's not what I said, fatboy.

"Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan."

yes it is what you said

That is.

What YOU said was untruthful.

I have never eaten YOUR #### therefore your are lying

You've misquoted me AGAIN, fatboy.

Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan.

exact quote you claim I have eaten YOUR ####


Exact proof that you're incompetent in English comprehension.

Steve K4YZ

wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 12:05:46 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:


"Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan."

yes it is what you said

That is.

then apolgize for lying

I didn't.

What I said was truthful.

What YOU said was untruthful.

and you have said it is untruthful

Nope.

Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan."

stop lying apoligize for your filth

I'm not lying...And the filth is YOURS...

Steve, K4YZ

I don't think the gentleman from Tennessee understands the situation in play here. A "Gentleman's Agreement" won't solve this problem.

The FCC Docket (intentionally or unintentionally?) effectively outlawed modes that previously were legal on 75M, specifically the use of automated data stations. The ARRL petition rightly asks FCC to reconsider and restore this mode to our use on this band.

The Man in the Maze
QRV from Baboquivari Peak, AZ

wrote:
wrote:
On 12 Dec 2006 12:05:46 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:


"Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
know...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
genitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan."

yes it is what you said

That is.

then apolgize for lying

I didn't.

and you need to

Nope.

What I said was truthful.

Morkie, I will conceed that you know two things that I will never
now...What it's like to lick my excrement off of another man's
gnitals, and the going welfare rates in Michigan.

those are your words and your lie

You participate in homosexual acts, by your own admission, then
whine about the :down side" of those acts.

Now...Do you have ANY intention of discussing the original topic,
or do you simply intend to keep retasking the subject line with your
"excrement" posts?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
FROM THE ARRL WEBSITE

League Asks FCC to Postpone, Modify Part of 75-Meter Band Change

NEWINGTON, CT, Dec 11, 2006 -- In separate petitions today, the ARRL
asked the FCC to postpone the change in allocation for 3600 to 3635 kHz
while it considers a request to maintain the status quo in the segment.
The so-called "omnibus" Report and Order (R&O) in WT Docket 04-140,
which included moving the lower edge of the Amateur Extra 75-meter
phone band to 3600 kHz, is set to go into effect Friday, December 15.
The League wants the Commission to rectify the "unintended consequence"
of the expansion by moving the dividing line between the narrowband and
wideband segments of 80/75 meters to 3635 kHz. This would keep 3600 to
3635 kHz available to General and higher licensees for RTTY, data and
CW and open to Novice and Tech Plus licensees for CW. The requested
change also would maintain access to the automatically controlled
digital subband, 3620 to 3635 kHz. In a Petition for Reconsideration,
the League emphasized that it was not seeking reconsideration of the
entire 75-meter phone band expansion.

"Rather, we ask only that the Commission restore the privileges
unintentionally withdrawn from those who operate and who utilize
automatically controlled narrowband digital stations between 3620 and
3635 kHz," the League said. The ARRL pointed out that while the R&O
left unchanged rules permitting automatically controlled narrowband
digital in that segment, it eliminated RTTY and data as permitted
emissions above 3600 kHz. The ARRL also filed a Petition for Partial
Stay of Effective Date of Rule pending final action on its
reconsideration petition.

To justify its far greater-than-requested expansion, the League
asserted, the FCC relied on the flawed logic of a handful of commenters
who specifically asked for a 3600 to 4000 kHz phone band. Some
commenters had made the case during the proceeding that the "CW
subband" is vastly underutilized while space for SSB is at a premium.

"It affects considerably more than just those two operating modes," the
ARRL said of the expansion. "Narrowband RTTY and data modes are
increasingly used at 80 meters as well, and substantial numbers of RTTY
and data users stand to be displaced, as well as precluded entirely, by
the extent of the telephony subband expansion there."

The League contends the FCC contradicted itself by saying the rule
revisions wouldn't result in any licensee losing spectrum privileges.
"But operating privileges have been lost by the extent of the expansion
at 80 meters," the reconsideration petition states. The expansion also
significantly burdens and adversely impacts CW nets above 3600 kHz --
including emergency and public service nets -- most, if not all, of
which will have to cease operating or change frequency, the League
added.

Most important, however, is the loss of spectrum for automatically
controlled digital modes. The ARRL petition cites the comments of
several League members decrying the loss of spectrum for PACTOR, CW and
RTTY. "The Winlink 2000 system was cited as a best practice by several
post-Hurricane Katrina reviews, including the Congressional 'Failure of
Initiative' report," remarked ARRL South Texas Section Emergency
Coordinator Jerry Reimer, KK5CA.

The ARRL says shifting the band edge slightly upward would provide a
"simple and equitable fix" to the obvious error in the R&O.

"This is neither a minor matter nor an academic exercise in future band
planning," the ARRL concluded. "It is an urgent problem which, unless
corrected, affects a substantial number of existing Amateur Radio fixed
facilities and an even more substantial number of mobile facilities."

UNQUOTE

This IS a minor matter and it IS an "...academic exercise in future
band planning..."

The ARRL USUALLY goes out of it's way to get the FCC to allow
"Gentleman's Agreements" and other "good Amateur practice" to establish
how Amateurs divy up the spectrum.

Now it wants the FCC to micomanage spectrum allocations.

The whole re-farming episode has been in the mill for three years
now, and there's no reason to gunk-up the works at H-Hour.

73

Steve, K4YZ

John Smith wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
FROM THE ARRL WEBSITE
...
73

Steve, K4YZ


As a "political action committee"/"lobbyist group" the arrl has long
outlived it usefulness ...

JS

It's time for the ARRL to butt out.

But there was in the response. CW testing is dead. Long live CW.

The Man in the Maze
QRS from Baboquivari Peak, Arizona