Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W2DNE wrote:
Dee Flint Wrote: This latter one had NO effect on the CW space allocated to Generals/Advanced. Yes that's quite correct. I was just making a general comment over the effect that the recent changes have on me. Being a CW ragchewer I'm happy to say that this new CW band loss won't affect me much since I seldom if ever used that upper part of the band. It's ironic though that if I had just kept my Novice license of 50 years ago I could have used it today and my present operation would be little changed. Course you couldn't keep a Novice license for more than a year in those days, so that's just wishful thinking... ![]() But of course it has an effect! It just dumped a quarter-million potential new users onto the 75M, 40M, 15M, and 10M CW segments. I think allowing all licenses on CW is a good idea. In fact I suggested exactly such a license change on this very group several years ago. You can guess what the response was. The population of the CW spectrum has been declining in recent years. And most of my QSOs are with hams well over 60. My theory is that the dead CW bands are due mostly to the dead CW hams. So I'm hoping that this change will help... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Get into the real arena | Antenna | |||
FCC BPL Report and Order Stresses Avoidance, Resolution of Harmful Interference | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1418 Â October 15, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1418 Â October 15, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Policy |