Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Sohl" wrote in message news ![]() "Dee Flint" wrote in message . .. "Alun L. Palmer" wrote in message . .. wrote in ups.com: [snip] 73 de N3KIP I'm firmly convinced that the number of petitions was a major hang-up on processing this. Each petition had a slightly different spin and each had a significant number of comments. The FCC staff had to digest all this and come to an agreement on just what approach would be taken. Dee, N8UZE I suspect it is just "low priority" within the FCC's scope of authority. Yup, I believe that was also a significant factor. It wouldn't surprise me if the only reasons they got to it now was because the office was slow and they wanted to clean up some loose ends before the end of the year. Cheers and Happy New Year to all, Thanks and same to you. My wish for the New Year is that this forum once again become a place for rational thought and discussion. The personal attacks and other slimeball commentary by those who know who they are should end. It is tragic that some people can't abide by simply repecting the medium and using it in a positive manner. I hope so too. OK, soapbox mode off :-) Bill K2UNK Dee, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2006 Rec.Radio.Cb Death Pool | CB | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy |