Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Heil wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: How can a new general class ham be considered to be inferior to an older general class ham when each ham took the one and only exam available at his particular time of testing? Now you're asking something different. Such a General Class licensee could easily be considered to have learned less material since less material is required in order to pass the exam. Surely you can see that. Certainly I can see that - times change. But should the new General Class licensee be forever relegated to the untouchable "nocode CBer" caste simply because of the timing of his birth? What if he has a PhD in RF engineering to go with his brand new General Class Amateur Radio License? What if he is ex-military and can do 40 wpm in Morse code? Isn't that worth anything or is he predestined to be forever shunned by older amateur radio operators because his exam was easier through no fault of his own? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |