wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:35:48 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
What are we to make of it--that people generally take the easiest
route to something?

When one is dealing with a governmental licensing
bureau, there is no "easiest route". Only one route
is offered by the rule *makers* for each license
class.

That's correct, but almost everyone *starts* with a license class having
less difficult requirements. You did it. I did it. Jim did it.

so what?

The *takers* of the exam cannot be blamed
for the present licensing structure.

...and I haven't blamed them. They took the exams which were available
to them.

bull**** Dave

you blamed them 2 layers back in this thread

How can a new
general class ham be considered to be inferior to
an older general class ham when each ham took the
one and only exam available at his particular time
of testing?

Now you're asking something different.

no he is not

Such a General Class licensee
could easily be considered to have learned less material since less
material is required in order to pass the exam. Surely you can see that.

so what? that is not the same as inferior Dave your use of langage is
slipshod


Incidentally, mice that take the easiest route
to the cheese hidden in a maze are considered
to be the most intelligent. :-)

The easiest way might not be the fastest way--and mice don't take
amateur radio exams.

meaning you don't value intelgence you value only your hazing ritual

Mark snipes with,
"Dave your use of langage is slipshod"
"you don't value intelgence "

Mark, you idiot. Your spelling is slipshod and your "intelgence" is lacking.