Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 8th 07, 11:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Default Dave aronagence contiues


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:35:48 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
What are we to make of it--that people generally take the easiest
route to something?

When one is dealing with a governmental licensing
bureau, there is no "easiest route". Only one route
is offered by the rule *makers* for each license
class.


That's correct, but almost everyone *starts* with a license class having
less difficult requirements. You did it. I did it. Jim did it.


so what?

The *takers* of the exam cannot be blamed
for the present licensing structure.


...and I haven't blamed them. They took the exams which were available
to them.


bull**** Dave

you blamed them 2 layers back in this thread

How can a new
general class ham be considered to be inferior to
an older general class ham when each ham took the
one and only exam available at his particular time
of testing?


Now you're asking something different.


no he is not

Such a General Class licensee
could easily be considered to have learned less material since less
material is required in order to pass the exam. Surely you can see that.


so what? that is not the same as inferior Dave your use of langage is
slipshod


Incidentally, mice that take the easiest route
to the cheese hidden in a maze are considered
to be the most intelligent. :-)


The easiest way might not be the fastest way--and mice don't take
amateur radio exams.


meaning you don't value intelgence you value only your hazing ritual


Mark snipes with,
"Dave your use of langage is slipshod"
"you don't value intelgence "

Mark, you idiot. Your spelling is slipshod and your "intelgence" is lacking.






  #2   Report Post  
Old January 8th 07, 11:53 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Dave aronagence contiues


DeLorean wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:35:48 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


meaning you don't value intelgence you value only your hazing ritual


Mark snipes with,
"Dave your use of langage is slipshod"
"you don't value intelgence "

Mark, you idiot. Your spelling is slipshod and your "intelgence" is lacking.

my spelling is slipshod always has been and always will and you logic
lacking in assuming that spelling (or code skill) is conceted to
intelgence
my spelling ym slipshod but I use words corectly dave does not

dave say that claiming ALL new hams are inferior to him becuase is not
blaming them for the tests

that is simply bull**** much like you "not naybody"

  #3   Report Post  
Old January 9th 07, 05:58 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 750
Default Dave aronagence contiues

DeLorean wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:35:48 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
What are we to make of it--that people generally take the easiest
route to something?
When one is dealing with a governmental licensing
bureau, there is no "easiest route". Only one route
is offered by the rule *makers* for each license
class.
That's correct, but almost everyone *starts* with a license class having
less difficult requirements. You did it. I did it. Jim did it.


so what?


The *takers* of the exam cannot be blamed
for the present licensing structure.
...and I haven't blamed them. They took the exams which were available
to them.

bull**** Dave

you blamed them 2 layers back in this thread
How can a new
general class ham be considered to be inferior to
an older general class ham when each ham took the
one and only exam available at his particular time
of testing?
Now you're asking something different.

no he is not

Such a General Class licensee
could easily be considered to have learned less material since less
material is required in order to pass the exam. Surely you can see that.


so what? that is not the same as inferior Dave your use of langage is
slipshod



The twit has some nerve calling anyone's use of "langage" slipshod. He
can't fully understand anything he tries to read and his use of
"langage" is so slipshod that most folks can't understand what he
writes. In short, Mark is a twit.

Incidentally, mice that take the easiest route
to the cheese hidden in a maze are considered
to be the most intelligent. :-)
The easiest way might not be the fastest way--and mice don't take
amateur radio exams.

meaning you don't value intelgence you value only your hazing ritual


Mark snipes with,
"Dave your use of langage is slipshod"
"you don't value intelgence "

Mark, you idiot. Your spelling is slipshod and your "intelgence" is lacking.


My "aronagence contiues", does it? Mark "contiues" to post as a
mindless twit. He repeatedly defines "inferior".


Dave K8MN
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? robert casey Policy 115 January 9th 07 12:28 PM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Shortwave 185 January 6th 04 06:05 PM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017