wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:

The cross postings from outside the amateur radio
groups the last few days have really been annoying.

That's an entirely DIFFERENT problem...one that Google
just REFUSES to acknowledge or to correct. Live with
it. Google refuses to fix the cross-posting problem that has
existed for years.

Or, in typical ostrich-syndrome elitism, just block them all
out. Then they won't exist. For you.

LA

The Heil groupies and Morgan stalkers continue to post despicable
things, but it is no worse than the Robesin "excrement eating" post.

wrote:
On 17 Jan 2007 15:07:24 -0800, wrote:
wrote:

Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap decide
what to do with it?

Why should it bother you that non-hams have a say in the ARS?

funny how the procoder have no logical consistantcy

It's called "corruption."

wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
wrote:

will be deciding what to do with it...

http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786

How will they do that?

They will use the proposed method. What did you think?

Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply
proposing
to create a moderated version.

They are?

People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups.

They will?

However,
much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the
moderation
process
on the other group.

It won't?

By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very
much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers.

Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap
decide
what to do with it?

They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and
those
who
wish to do so will continue to post.

Dee, N8UZE

I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to
continue to post.

It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap.

Dee, N8UZE

I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a
dissenting opinion.


Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me
or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or
another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio
groups the last few days have really been annoying.

Dee, N8UZE

Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no
one seems to mind that.

Robesin is a code-tested amateur extra. Those title-holders can do
anything they want anywhere...according to them. Ahem...look at
the list of "moderators" and the Titles they hold. QED.

LA

wrote:
wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
wrote:

will be deciding what to do with it...

http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786

How will they do that?

They will use the proposed method. What did you think?

Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply
proposing
to create a moderated version.

They are?

People will have the choice to post to either or both newsgroups.

They will?

However,
much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the
moderation
process
on the other group.

It won't?

By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know very
much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the answers.

Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap
decide
what to do with it?

They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and
those
who
wish to do so will continue to post.

Dee, N8UZE

I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to
continue to post.

It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap.

Dee, N8UZE

I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a
dissenting opinion.


Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block me
or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time or
another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio
groups the last few days have really been annoying.

Dee, N8UZE

Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no
one seems to mind that.

Robesin is a code-tested amateur extra. Those title-holders can do
anything they want anywhere...according to them. Ahem...look at
the list of "moderators" and the Titles they hold. QED.

LA

The new group will be like "Home, home on the range..." "Where never
is heard a dissenting word..."

wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
wrote:

will be deciding what to do with it...

http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786

How will they do that?

They will use the proposed method. What did you think?

Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply
proposing
to create a moderated version.

They are?

People will have the choice to post to either or both
newsgroups.

They will?

However,
much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the
moderation
process
on the other group.

It won't?

By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know
very
much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the
answers.

Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap
decide
what to do with it?

They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and
those
who
wish to do so will continue to post.

Dee, N8UZE

I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to
continue to post.

It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap.

Dee, N8UZE

I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a
dissenting opinion.


Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block
me
or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time
or
another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio
groups the last few days have really been annoying.

Dee, N8UZE

Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no
one seems to mind that.


Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who
post objectionable material. I'm not going to waste my time. Much more fun
to debate license classes.

Dee, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee, N8UZE

Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no
one seems to mind that.


Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who
post objectionable material.

Funny I more or less selinced him

if I had had your help it could have been done easier and more
effctively
I'm not going to waste my time.

Hmm I am member of what you term an iferioir can do something you
can't?

Much more fun
to debate license classes.

Dee, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
wrote:
wrote:

will be deciding what to do with it...

http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard....T&f=3&t=142786

How will they do that?

They will use the proposed method. What did you think?

Those folks aren't proposing to shut down RRAP. They are simply
proposing
to create a moderated version.

They are?

People will have the choice to post to either or both
newsgroups.

They will?

However,
much of what gets posted to RRAP will not get through the
moderation
process
on the other group.

It won't?

By your first question above, you indicate that you don't know
very
much about the process. Now you pretend to have all of the
answers.

Besides, why should it bother you if people who aren't on rrap
decide
what to do with it?

They aren't doing anything to rrap. It will continue to exist and
those
who
wish to do so will continue to post.

Dee, N8UZE

I think the express purpose is to limit those who would wish to
continue to post.

It does not stop anyone from posting to rrap.

Dee, N8UZE

I'm sure you'll enjoy your little cocoon where never is heard a
dissenting opinion.


Well that's interesting because the moderators will either have to block
me
or block everyone else since I've disagreed with most people at one time
or
another on something. The cross postings from outside the amateur radio
groups the last few days have really been annoying.

Dee, N8UZE

Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no
one seems to mind that.


Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who
post objectionable material. I'm not going to waste my time.

Robesin interprets that as "approval."

Much more fun
to debate license classes.

Dee, N8UZE

wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Dee, N8UZE

Dee, it's no worse than Robesin's "excrement eating" posting, but no
one seems to mind that.


Well I've found that it's pointless and ineffective to admonish those who
post objectionable material. I'm not going to waste my time.

Robesin interprets that as "approval."

as do most people with any knowledge of the holocost

wrote:

It's been the style of the morsemen on this newsgroup...

There's no such thing as "morsemen", Len.

...to belittle, denigrate, enage in prissy little pedantic diatribes...

It is amazing that those very words fit your own style, Leonard.

...over
words that do not fit in the code-tested amateur extra
"expertise" opinions on What Is Good For [US] Amateur Radio.

You have lots of opinions on what is good for amateur radio. You've
never in your life had an amateur radio license.

Dave K8MN

From: Dave Heil on Fri, Jan 19 2007 4:26 pm

wrote:

It's been the style of the morsemen on this newsgroup...

There's no such thing as "morsemen", Len.

Then YOU "don't exist" morseman Heil. :-)


...to belittle, denigrate, enage in prissy little pedantic diatribes...

It is amazing that those very words fit your own style, Leonard.

Awwww...feeling snarly again, Colonel Klunk? :-)

Oh, my, you still can't lose your arrogant sneering,
can you?

Maybe you dislike being a little red-hatted monkey
dancing for organ grinder Miccolis? You want to
"grind his organ," do you? :-)


...over
words that do not fit in the code-tested amateur extra
"expertise" opinions on What Is Good For [US] Amateur Radio.

You have lots of opinions on what is good for amateur radio.

No, Herr Robust, I've been advocating subjects
concerning GETTING INTO US amateur radio. GETTING
INTO. As in the TESTS necessary for GETTING INTO it.

That change of law (regulations) is about to be
realized about the middle of next week (if we can
believe the 'insiders' at the ARRL - Chris Imlay
and his partners/staff probably).

You've never in your life had an amateur radio license.

RIIIIIGHT!!! My, my, aren't you so schmardtt!

Must have taken your poor little 16 synapses
all day to calculate that!

Oh, but wait...you were BORN with an amateur radio
license? Don't tell us you did the "USAF thing"
and "never went to school" on that?

Last I looked, absolutely NOBODY was born with a
ham radio license. Everyone who has an amateur
radio license NEVER HAD ONE IN THEIR LIFE before
the were granted one! Really.

Funny thing, Herr Robust Oberst, but NOBODY AT THE
FCC IS *REQUIRED* TO HAVE AN AMATEUR RADIO LICENSE!
Those are the folks who grant ham licenses, remember?
Those are the folks who decide the law on US amateur
radio!

Sunnuvagun! Ain't that somethin' tho?

Herr Oberst, did you think that *I* "swung" the FCC
into their decision on 06-178? I don't think so.
Half of the document containing FCC 06-178 is devoted
to nothing but names of those who commented on the
NPRM. Not all of those had ham licenses...or even
amateur radio licenses! Really!

You see, it's one of the really neat things about
American government and the RIGHTS of citizens...we
can ALL comment to our government. Really. It's a
guarantee of our Constitution. Really.

Now, Herr Robust, you LOSE that threadbare Waffen
SS uniform and the silly monocle. Your tuff guy
act is trite, old, and out of place. Don't try to
intimidate anyone with your bluster and bluff. It
may work on teen-agers but not with us adults. We
see through your pathetic little attempts at mind
games. Those just don't work. Get a new act...like
imitating a human being...then others wouldn't think
you were such a prick.

FCC 06-178 has been decided. The code test will be
GONE. Your "operator expertise" schtick is going to
be broken. All you will be able to do is cry in your
pablum and prune juice about "your" good old days
when "you were tall dog in the pound" with your "CW"
skills and your amateur Titles.

Fork you and the hearse you rode in on...