Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 18th 07, 11:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default Appropriate number of license classes


wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]

Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the
drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his
heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm
going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at
worst, one full class, and one learners class.


I think it would be an excellent subject for debate.

To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and Extra.
I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move forward
anyway and have mentioned this before.

It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the Technician
and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is
actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the
licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each
specific test, there is enough overlap that it would be reasonable for a
candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it
would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and merge
the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class and
merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000.

Dee, N8UZE


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 19th 07, 01:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Appropriate number of license classes


Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]

Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the
drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his
heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm
going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at
worst, one full class, and one learners class.


I think it would be an excellent subject for debate.


Yup. It's on-topic and it's something everyone can argue over.

To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and Extra.
I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move forward
anyway and have mentioned this before.


Now, see, you got it wrong already. ;^)

It should be Technician and Extra, but renamed Amateur Limited and
Amateur, respectively.

It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the Technician
and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is
actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the
licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each
specific test, there is enough overlap


There is gross overlap, as the General is the parent of the Tech. Tech
used to be the consolation prize for people failing the 13WPM morse
code exam. And the General is not an introductory license - it once
conveyed 100% of all amateur privileges.

that it would be reasonable for a
candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it
would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and merge
the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class and
merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000.

Dee, N8UZE


Hopefully, we'll be able to convince each other as we did the morse
exam debate.

  #3   Report Post  
Old January 19th 07, 01:57 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,027
Default Appropriate number of license classes


wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]

Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the
drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his
heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm
going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at
worst, one full class, and one learners class.


I think it would be an excellent subject for debate.


Yup. It's on-topic and it's something everyone can argue over.

To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and Extra.
I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move forward
anyway and have mentioned this before.


Now, see, you got it wrong already. ;^)

It should be Technician and Extra, but renamed Amateur Limited and
Amateur, respectively.

It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the Technician
and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is
actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the
licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each
specific test, there is enough overlap


There is gross overlap, as the General is the parent of the Tech. Tech
used to be the consolation prize for people failing the 13WPM morse
code exam. And the General is not an introductory license - it once
conveyed 100% of all amateur privileges.

that it would be reasonable for a
candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it
would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and merge
the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class and
merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000.

Dee, N8UZE


Hopefully, we'll be able to convince each other as we did the morse
exam debate.


Oh, NO! :-)

LA

  #4   Report Post  
Old January 19th 07, 03:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default Appropriate number of license classes


wrote in message
oups.com...

Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]

Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the
drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his
heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm
going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at
worst, one full class, and one learners class.


I think it would be an excellent subject for debate.


Yup. It's on-topic and it's something everyone can argue over.

To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and
Extra.
I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move
forward
anyway and have mentioned this before.


Now, see, you got it wrong already. ;^)

It should be Technician and Extra, but renamed Amateur Limited and
Amateur, respectively.

It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the
Technician
and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is
actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the
licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each
specific test, there is enough overlap


There is gross overlap, as the General is the parent of the Tech. Tech
used to be the consolation prize for people failing the 13WPM morse
code exam. And the General is not an introductory license - it once
conveyed 100% of all amateur privileges.

that it would be reasonable for a
candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it
would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and
merge
the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class
and
merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000.

Dee, N8UZE


Hopefully, we'll be able to convince each other as we did the morse
exam debate.


I'm sure it will be just as effective. I still believe that the basic morse
test should have been kept but it's water under the bridge.

Dee, N8UZE


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rare Books on Radio and Electronics Hania Lux Shortwave 0 October 18th 03 12:13 AM
Low reenlistment rate charlesb Policy 54 September 18th 03 01:57 PM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 02:08 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement ROLDAIGNAULT CB 22 July 31st 03 12:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017