Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... [snip] Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at worst, one full class, and one learners class. I think it would be an excellent subject for debate. To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and Extra. I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move forward anyway and have mentioned this before. It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the Technician and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each specific test, there is enough overlap that it would be reasonable for a candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and merge the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class and merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000. Dee, N8UZE |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... [snip] Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at worst, one full class, and one learners class. I think it would be an excellent subject for debate. Yup. It's on-topic and it's something everyone can argue over. To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and Extra. I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move forward anyway and have mentioned this before. Now, see, you got it wrong already. ;^) It should be Technician and Extra, but renamed Amateur Limited and Amateur, respectively. It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the Technician and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each specific test, there is enough overlap There is gross overlap, as the General is the parent of the Tech. Tech used to be the consolation prize for people failing the 13WPM morse code exam. And the General is not an introductory license - it once conveyed 100% of all amateur privileges. that it would be reasonable for a candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and merge the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class and merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000. Dee, N8UZE Hopefully, we'll be able to convince each other as we did the morse exam debate. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... [snip] Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at worst, one full class, and one learners class. I think it would be an excellent subject for debate. Yup. It's on-topic and it's something everyone can argue over. To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and Extra. I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move forward anyway and have mentioned this before. Now, see, you got it wrong already. ;^) It should be Technician and Extra, but renamed Amateur Limited and Amateur, respectively. It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the Technician and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each specific test, there is enough overlap There is gross overlap, as the General is the parent of the Tech. Tech used to be the consolation prize for people failing the 13WPM morse code exam. And the General is not an introductory license - it once conveyed 100% of all amateur privileges. that it would be reasonable for a candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and merge the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class and merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000. Dee, N8UZE Hopefully, we'll be able to convince each other as we did the morse exam debate. Oh, NO! :-) LA |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... [snip] Welp, I think I'm going to try to get into the new group and beat the drum of "One Amateur Radio, One Amateur Radio License." Jim had his heart set on "more license classes" when we had five of them. I'm going to see what I can do about making it one license class, or at worst, one full class, and one learners class. I think it would be an excellent subject for debate. Yup. It's on-topic and it's something everyone can argue over. To me, it seems that two classes would be appropriate: General and Extra. I think this will actually become the de facto structure as we move forward anyway and have mentioned this before. Now, see, you got it wrong already. ;^) It should be Technician and Extra, but renamed Amateur Limited and Amateur, respectively. It is not unreasonable for the prospective ham to study both the Technician and General material and take both writtens at the same time. This is actually what I will be suggesting to those that I help prepare for the licensing tests. While there is some material that is unique to each specific test, there is enough overlap There is gross overlap, as the General is the parent of the Tech. Tech used to be the consolation prize for people failing the 13WPM morse code exam. And the General is not an introductory license - it once conveyed 100% of all amateur privileges. that it would be reasonable for a candidate to prepare for going straight to General. In time, I think it would be reasonable to make the Technician a closed license class and merge the question pools just as they did when they closed the Advanced class and merged the question pools for Advanced and Extra back in 2000. Dee, N8UZE Hopefully, we'll be able to convince each other as we did the morse exam debate. I'm sure it will be just as effective. I still believe that the basic morse test should have been kept but it's water under the bridge. Dee, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rare Books on Radio and Electronics | Shortwave | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | CB |