Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 14th 07, 12:10 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,027
Default ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams

On Feb 13, 3:56�pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...
On Feb 13, 9:48?am, wrote:


On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:01 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:


*Hello? This is February 12, 2007. FACTUAL ERROR!!!


*There's one little problem, "Stefan." Isn't ANY "Stefan Wolfe"
*in the FCC CORES database. The best that can be found
*are two Steven Wolfes:


*Steven H. Wolfe, KC4UZW, Tech, FRN 0004408340
*Steven B. Wolfe, KC9KTN, Tech, FRN 0016067183


You have something in common. Despite your boast of seven years ago,
there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an
Amateur Extra.


but no extra out of the box is avalable yet Dave


* *Mark, ignore that old weenie. *"Out of the box" has always been
* *available when the FCC set regulations so that one did NOT have
* *to wear radio training pants as a novice or "lesser" classes.

* *The old weenie is just trying some stupid, juvenile emotional-
* *baggage "come back" because that's all he has left in his
* *repertoire of "replies." *He's tried the same macho-middle-
* *school baggage thing with "years of interest and no ham
* *license." *:-)

* *I've kept saying that my advocacy has always been to
* *eliminate the morse code test from FCC licensing regs.
* *The FCC has finally, legally AGREED. *Now all the morsemen
* *are "unhappy" and are trying to take out their frustrations on
* *those they think are "lesser" individuals. *Boo hoo for them.

It seems that kb9rqz gives you the opportunity to post from the spring board
of absurdity so you can dive into the darkest reaches of ham radio
existentialism.


Nope, Mark isn't "my springboard." EVERYONE is a
springboard and it ain't any "existentialism."

Now, quit misdirecting and explain WHY you are claiming
all this "ham radio experience" and there isn't any record
of a "Stefan Wolfe" at the FCC. Are you a ham in Canada?
In Mexico? Where?


I do enjoy your posts and consider them negative feedback of our worst
characteristics. That is, you are a the negative feedback loop of *hign gain
op amp that stabilizes kb9rqz's wild oscillations.


"Stefan," the only "wild oscillation" is YOURS about Mark.
You seem to have a wild hair itching on him. Not my
problem. It's yours.

LA

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 14th 07, 02:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 179
Default ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams


wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 13, 3:56?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

It seems that kb9rqz gives you the opportunity to post from the spring
board
of absurdity so you can dive into the darkest reaches of ham radio
existentialism.


Nope, Mark isn't "my springboard." EVERYONE is a
springboard and it ain't any "existentialism."

Oh yes he is. You often use his posts as an excuse to launch "negative
feedback". And your posts almost universally question the purpose the the
existence of amateur radio's existence. That is the fundamental basis of
existentialism.

Now, quit misdirecting and explain WHY you are claiming
all this "ham radio experience" and there isn't any record
of a "Stefan Wolfe" at the FCC. Are you a ham in Canada?
In Mexico? Where?

My FCC amateur status is not relevant on any usenet newsgroup; however,
since you ask, I happen to be a 13wpm extra. I do not care to prove it. I do
not care what you believe about my FCC status since no license is required
to post here in any case.

I do enjoy your posts and consider them negative feedback of our worst
characteristics. That is, you are a the negative feedback loop of hign
gain
op amp that stabilizes kb9rqz's wild oscillations.


"Stefan," the only "wild oscillation" is YOURS about Mark.
You seem to have a wild hair itching on him. Not my
problem. It's yours.

I am not sure exactly what a wild hair itching is. It is not a complete
metaphor. Frequently you seem to use metaphors that have a good sound but
really make no sense. If I were to to say "len has a wild air itching on
amateurs who support code", that would seem to imply, but only indirectly,
that you have a psychological aversion of those who have a talent that your
cannot duplicate and never will. For all I know, the root cause may have
more to do with, say, your wife, than with amateur radio. It is simply a
wild hair itching. Now, if I were to say "morse code is the wild hair that
grows inside len's ear which he fears to cut because he knows it will never
go away but will come back with a vengeance"...That is a complete metaphor.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No More Element 1 [email protected] Policy 83 February 2nd 07 03:18 AM
another place the fruit can't post MarQueerMyDear Policy 2 November 21st 06 05:22 AM
Why You Don't Like The ARRL Louis C. LeVine Policy 803 January 23rd 04 01:12 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017