On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will
far exceed the number of posts in the group itself.

KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated
will
far exceed the number of posts in the group itself.

KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

That is odd isn't it?

"Bob Brock" wrote:

KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

That is odd isn't it?

Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm,
Cox's news servers don't have it.)

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:00:03 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:

"Bob Brock" wrote:

KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

That is odd isn't it?

Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm,
Cox's news servers don't have it.)

Have fun if when you get it.

On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote:
KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

That is odd isn't it?

Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm,
Cox's news servers don't have it.)

Cox's what?

Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google.

On 24 Feb 2007 17:17:29 -0800, wrote:

On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote:
KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

That is odd isn't it?

Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm,
Cox's news servers don't have it.)

Cox's what?

Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google.

You volunteering to elmer him? ;-)

Bob Brock wrote in
:

On 24 Feb 2007 17:17:29 -0800, wrote:

On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote:
KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

That is odd isn't it?

Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of
8pm, Cox's news servers don't have it.)

Cox's what?

Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google.

You volunteering to elmer him? ;-)

Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do
with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. You are participating in
rram, you're just doing it in a different group.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

"Mike Coslo" wrote:

Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do
with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts.

You noticed that too, huh?

Mike Coslo wrote:

...
Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do
with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. You are participating in
rram, you're just doing it in a different group.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

I think that is the proper way to do it. The catholics make fun of the
mormons, and we do so OUTSIDE their church ... I don't know for certain,
but I would suspect they do the exact opposite--and obviously, outside
the catholic church.

JS

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:34:42 -0600, Mike Coslo
wrote:

Bob Brock wrote in
:

On 24 Feb 2007 17:17:29 -0800, wrote:

On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote:
KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod.

That is odd isn't it?

Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of
8pm, Cox's news servers don't have it.)

Cox's what?

Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google.

You volunteering to elmer him? ;-)

Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do
with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts.

I was just trying to figure out what people K6HZ was saying were being
excluded from RRAM. Now I find out that he is one of them.


You are participating in
rram, you're just doing it in a different group.

Laughing at is not equivalent to participating in. Sorry, I couldn't
help myself. This post made the number of replies to this thread
equal to the total number of posts to RRAM since inception.

I notice that this group has settled down nicely now that they have a
home base. I like it. I will however be happier when those who feel
excluded have access to the group. Then their excuse for whining will
be gone.