On Feb 25, 6:46 pm, KC8GXW-Jim wrote:

...
what do this hav to do with radio?

It has to do with the unwritten policy which has been a thorn in the
side of many amateurs and others with interests in the public amateur
bands.

It has do with stealth and deception (or, disinformation--as the
ruskies term it)--you know, say one thing--do another. It has to do
with the POLICY surrounding amateur radio. Did you miss the title of
this newsgroup? rec.radio.amateur.POLICY

However, we are willing to answer imbecilic questions such as yours
also, I mean, who wants to split hairs.

JS

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 25, 6:46 pm, KC8GXW-Jim wrote:

...
what do this hav to do with radio?

It has to do with the unwritten policy which has been a thorn in the
side of many amateurs and others with interests in the public amateur
bands.

It has do with stealth and deception (or, disinformation--as the
ruskies term it)--you know, say one thing--do another. It has to do
with the POLICY surrounding amateur radio. Did you miss the title of
this newsgroup? rec.radio.amateur.POLICY

However, we are willing to answer imbecilic questions such as yours
also, I mean, who wants to split hairs.

JS

why are you tlaking to yourself forger
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

wrote:
On Feb 25, 6:46 pm, KC8GXW-Jim wrote:


...
what do this hav to do with radio?


It has to do with the unwritten policy which has been a thorn in the
side of many amateurs and others with interests in the public amateur
bands.

It has do with stealth and deception (or, disinformation--as the
ruskies term it)--you know, say one thing--do another. It has to do
with the POLICY surrounding amateur radio. Did you miss the title of
this newsgroup? rec.radio.amateur.POLICY

However, we are willing to answer imbecilic questions such as yours
also, I mean, who wants to split hairs.

JS

And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another
imbecilic answer.
i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you
answer with your unthought out da remark?

On Feb 26, 7:51 am, KC8GXW-Jim wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 25, 6:46 pm, KC8GXW-Jim wrote:

...
what do this hav to do with radio?

It has to do with the unwritten policy which has been a thorn in the
side of many amateurs and others with interests in the public amateur
bands.

It has do with stealth and deception (or, disinformation--as the
ruskies term it)--you know, say one thing--do another. It has to do
with the POLICY surrounding amateur radio. Did you miss the title of
this newsgroup? rec.radio.amateur.POLICY

However, we are willing to answer imbecilic questions such as yours
also, I mean, who wants to split hairs.

JS

And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another
imbecilic answer.
i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you
answer with your unthought out da remark?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

KC8GXW-Jim wrote:

...
And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another
imbecilic answer.
i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you
answer with your unthought out da remark?

I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to
your imbecilic question.

However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for
him, sorry ...

JS

wrote:
KC8GXW-Jim wrote:


...
And this has what to do with my question to mark? besides being another
imbecilic answer.
i asked kb9rqz what his response had to do with radio, why would you
answer with your unthought out da remark?


I wanted to make sure you had a clear, concise and accurate answer to
your imbecilic question.

However, I did NOT mean to come between Mark and your affections for
him, sorry ...

JS

Aww, are you jelouis? jump right in and have a go at him if you feel the
need, don't let me stand in your gay way
or do you just feel the need to stick up for the tard?