Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #71   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 04:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default just another stalking thread

On Mar 5, 10:47 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:40?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:





On Mar 5, 9:19 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:


On Mar 4, 11:15?pm, wrote:


Most normal people can follow a thread and only respond when in
conversation,


I can follow but you post to threads not addressed to you


You can't follow a thread,..............


yes I can


........ which is evidenced by you answering every
single post, even when it is directed to another person.


I can answer any thread I like


but it's inappropriate


nope

it is the whole point of NG's



so can you


Yes, but I try to follow NG ediquite, something that you obviously
something you know nothing about

where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law

you do not enage in on topic post that is a violation of neNG policy


  #72   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 08:07 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 106
Default Thank God for the Moderated Group.

On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:
where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law


Who is defaming you? I started this thread about the moderated group,
you hijacked MY thread, and you took it off topic. Everything that I
have posted is based upon my view and observation of the posts on here
and responses to specific posts. If you don't like it, you can take a
quarter and call someone who cares.

If a law has been broken, call the law. You know what law has been
broken, none.

And who has forged a name. Dloyd Lavies is my pen name, many authors
have pen names, it is legal. Don't try to play lawyer, it is apparent
that you have no legal training whatsoever because you throw acusitory
legal terms around without knowing the implications of such terms.

you do not enage in on topic post that is a violation of neNG policy


You are blabbering something about a violation of NG policy, but your
fumble fingers has made it unreadable, but I will address one policy
violation issue, which is your excessive posting. Your excessive
posting is a violation of Google Groups Policy, because if you posted
directly into the group instead of a news server and using all of your
different names, you access to post would be limited. It is apparent
that you post using one name until you are suspended, then you start
using another, just to flood the group with your posts.

Google Groups Help Center

Is there a limit on how often I can post?

Yes, there are a few ways in which posting frequency is limited. One
limits the number of messages posted to a single group within a short
period of time. If that limit is reached, posting to that group will
be frozen temporarily and you'll be instructed to post again later.

Another limits the number of messages a single user can post via email
in a short period of time. If that limit is reached, your posting
account will be disabled. If your account has been disabled, you can
click the "contact us" link below and request that your account be
reactivated. We'll review your request, and let you know what we
decide.

We may also limit the number of messages a single user or computer can
post via our website in a short period of time. If that limit is
reached, posting will be frozen temporarily and you'll be instructed
to post again later.

Please note, we are unable to provide the exact numbers that trigger
these posting limits as the limits are subject to change.

These limits are to protect the users of our service and their email
accounts, our groups, and the Usenet community from poorly configured
auto-responders, spammers, robots, trolls, and thread hijacking.


Google Groups.

id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing
Don't bet your life on that.


you can find anytime you like Id rather you did not esp now it would
be rough getting the blood up off the snow

What blood, you would be on your knees in about a 10 seconds withont
any blood at all. I saw your photo, no problem. The goal is to apply
a lot of pain without any residual evidence of such force. Many law
enforcement agencies and federal employers, such as my former, provide
excellent training in the application of these techniques. But of
course, this requires me to actually touch you, but you appear to be
way too filthy and dirty that I would ever want to touch your. Do
ever take a bath? I bet LLoyd is cleaner than you.

if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter

Well if you killed me because I was kicking your ass, that means you
would be guilty of murder, so you would end up in jail for life.


nope. indeed I don't have to wait for the first blow to land,
althought that would be safer legaly

Sure Markie, that defense would not stand a chance in any district or
judical circuit in the US, even in the 8th circuit.
Like I said, it is apparent that you have no legal training
whatsoever.

not the case in Michigan


Actually, Michigan is one of the more liberal circuits, you better
have significant evidence to warrant justifiable homicide. The courts
would put you away forever if you try to say "oh he was giving me a
hard time on the internet after I **** on everyone's postings, and I
was scared, so I killed him even though he had no weapons. You are
such an idiot.

stop whining like a little bitch just because you can't poison the moderated group.


I don't want to poison any NG please stop lying about me


No lie, you flooding policy and misc. is evidence enough of your handy
work.


Dloyd Lavies, Sweat Lord and Talk Show Buffoon
"In the Domestic Rear"


http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com


  #73   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 08:23 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default Thank God for the Moderated Group.

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:

where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law


Who is defaming you?

how do I know

I started this thread about the moderated group,
you hijacked MY thread, and you took it off topic.


it was never ontopic

it is not YOUR thread

once you post it it belongs to RRAP

Everything that I
have posted is based upon my view and observation of the posts on here
and responses to specific posts.


and you personal bigootries

If you don't like it, you can take a
quarter and call someone who cares.


I can call anyone I like anyway mighty white of you to grant me that
right
Dloyd Lavies is my pen name, many authors
have pen names, it is legal.


bull****

with you blog and your use of LLoyd image you are a criminal fraud

  #74   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 08:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default just another stalking post

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:

where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law


Who is defaming you?


You are blabbering something about a violation of NG policy, but your
fumble fingers has made it unreadable, but I will address one policy
violation issue, which is your excessive posting.

you just defamed me again

  #75   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 08:27 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default just another stalking thread

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:

where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law


id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing
Don't bet your life on that.


you can find anytime you like Id rather you did not esp now it would
be rough getting the blood up off the snow

What blood, you would be on your knees in about a 10 seconds withont
any blood at all.

well you have now clearly comited the crime of stalking
I saw your photo, no problem. The goal is to apply
a lot of pain without any residual evidence of such force. Many law
enforcement agencies and federal employers, such as my former, provide
excellent training in the application of these techniques. But of
course, this requires me to actually touch you, but you appear to be
way too filthy and dirty that I would ever want to touch your. Do
ever take a bath? I bet LLoyd is cleaner than you.


and you just defamed me again



  #76   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 08:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default just another death threat

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:


if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter

Well if you killed me because I was kicking your ass, that means you
would be guilty of murder, so you would end up in jail for life.


nope. indeed I don't have to wait for the first blow to land,
althought that would be safer legaly

Sure Markie, that defense would not stand a chance in any district or
judical circuit in the US, even in the 8th circuit.


noit acording to the testimony of the THIS counties DA and sheriff in
rergard to recent charges in law

Like I said, it is apparent that you have no legal training
whatsoever.


but I trust the sheriif and DA's legal training

not the case in Michigan


Actually, Michigan is one of the more liberal circuits, you better
have significant evidence to warrant justifiable homicide. The courts
would put you away forever if you try to say "oh he was giving me a
hard time on the internet after I **** on everyone's postings, and I
was scared, so I killed him even though he had no weapons.


no Dloyd your post that you would kill if you showed means I can kill
you out of hand

I would say he threatened to kill if he showed up he showed therfore
there was a clear danger I did not know if he was armed or not

  #77   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 08:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default just another stalking thread

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:


stop whining like a little bitch just because you can't poison the moderated group.

I don't want to poison any NG please stop lying about me


No lie, you flooding policy and misc. is evidence enough of your handy
work.

nothing but lies DloydI don't fllod either NG you and your sockpuppets
do I just respond mostly with terranews althought they are having
issues today so I am using Google

while you enage in violations of Copyright law and defame myslef and
Lloyd on your blogs

I would rather discuss radio

you don't do that

ever

  #78   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 08:43 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 106
Default just another stalking thread

On Mar 5, 2:27�pm, "an_old_friend" wrote:
where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law
id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing
Don't bet your life on that.


you can find anytime you like Id rather you did not esp now it would
be rough getting the blood up off the snow


What blood, you would be on your knees in about a 10 seconds withont
any blood at all.


well you have now clearly comited the crime of stalking


No it is not stalking, you have clearly forgot about the hypothetical
situation under which this was posted. Its a hypothisis, dummy. How
many times do I have to tell you to stop playing lawyer. You have no
professional legal experience and don't know the implication of the
terms your are using so freely. BTW your the one who implicated blood
shed, remember.

I saw your photo, no problem. *The goal is to apply
a lot of pain without any residual evidence of such force. *Many law
enforcement agencies and federal employers, such as my former, provide
excellent training in the application of these techniques. *But of
course, this requires me to actually touch you, but you appear to be
way too filthy and dirty that I would ever want to touch your. *Do
ever take a bath? * I bet LLoyd is cleaner than you.


and you just defamed me again


It is not defamation, it is subjective, and based upon MY standards of
cleanliness. I saw the photo of you, and under my standards, you
appear to be a dirty. I've also seen photo's of LLoyd and he does not
appear to be as dirty as you, under MY standards. Not everything is
black and white, some things are subjective. You may see a glass half
empty, I may see it half full. BTW if your going to post on my blog
watch your language. Just because you look fility, does not mean you
have to use fility language.


Dloyd Lavies, Sweat Lord and Talk Show Buffoon
"In the Domestic Rear"


http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com






  #79   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 09:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 106
Default just another death threat

On Mar 5, 2:30�pm, "an_old_friend" wrote:
On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:


if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter
Well if you killed me because I was kicking your ass, that means you
would be guilty of murder, so you would end up in jail for life.


nope. indeed I don't have to wait for the first blow to land,
althought that would be safer legaly


Sure Markie, that defense would not stand a chance in any district or
judical circuit in the US, even in the 8th circuit.


noit acording to the testimony of the THIS counties DA and sheriff in
rergard to recent charges in law

Like I said, it is apparent that you have no legal training
whatsoever.


but I trust the sheriif and DA's legal training



not the case in Michigan


Actually, Michigan is one of the more liberal circuits, you better
have significant evidence to warrant justifiable homicide. *The courts
would put you away forever if you try to say "oh he was giving me a
hard time on the internet after I **** on everyone's postings, and I
was scared, so I killed him even though he had no weapons. *


no Dloyd your post that you would kill if you showed means I can kill
you out of hand

I would say he threatened to kill if he showed up he showed therfore
there was a clear danger I did not know if he was armed or not


I never said I would kill anyone you mental retard. Now that is
actual slander from you. You were the one who brought up killing
someone. You better review the thread...

You were the one that said. That if someone slapped you that would
result in the death of the perpetrator. You were the one that stated
that if someone tried to kick your ass you would kill them..you need
to get your facts straight.


Dloyd Lavies, Sweat Lord and Talk Show Buffoon
"In the Domestic Rear"


http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com











  #80   Report Post  
Old March 5th 07, 09:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 300
Default http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.amateur.policy/browse_thread/thread/594a54cb8933c119/761312ef1e9ef761?lnk=gst&q=shot+kill+erlpn&rnum=2& hl=en#761312ef1e9ef761

wrote:

By your standards, I being stalked by Brian and Lennie, am I not?


no since no no one threatened your murder


Stalking isn't assault.

I haven't seen any evidence of this "threatened" murder yet.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
REPOST: 3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) [email protected] Policy 127 February 22nd 07 04:01 AM
Grundig-S350DL-Moderated Yahoo group homepc Shortwave 12 October 8th 06 06:41 PM
Conversion To Moderated Group Time Lord Policy 12 May 20th 06 03:38 PM
Shortwaves Yahoo Group JOIN UP -Its Moderated! noname Shortwave 0 August 6th 04 02:16 PM
this group needs to be moderated by the keyclowns. gw CB 9 October 11th 03 09:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017