(N2EY) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: (William)
Date: 8/17/2004 8:38 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(N2EY) wrote in message
.com...
(WA8ULX) wrote in message
...
Total growth of 901 in that much time isn't healthy. Reducing the code
test
to
just 5 wpm did not result in sustained growth, and neither did reducing
the
written tests.

Of course not, all it did was give Lazy Ass people like Karl a FREE
UPGRADE

Karl who?

When and how did you get *your* Extra, Bruce? Was it in front of an
FCC examiner? 20 wpm code, send and receive? Did you take the old
written tests, too?

Or did you bypass all that and get it after April 15, 2000 - just like
the folks you call "lazy"?

N2EY

Well, well, well! I think Jimmy Who found his backbone.

Maybe he'll stand up to Steve's abuses next, if he doesn't fear legal
action or "Dialing..."

All I can say is, "Bravo!"

Jim's had his "backbone" for quite a while.

As for Jim...He's quite independent.

Thanks, Steve, but this isn't the first time I've commented on 'ULX's
nonsense about "real hams" and such.

For example check out:

28 Sep 2003:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain


03 Oct 2003

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

just to name a few.

Just to name a few? I think you've exhausted Google.

You sat by for Years while Bruce abused this newsgroup with his
abusive, illiterate postings. Only after you suggested that he was
brilliant, and I kept calling you on it, did you say the first honest
thing about Bruce.

He and I disagree on a great many
things and always manage to not have to resort to the type of conduct that you
and Lennie the Liar seem to find necessary.

Gentlemen can disagree without being disagreeable.

I find Steve highly disagreeable. He's actually abusive.

That would be, in particular, lying to each otehr or calling each otehr
names.

As for "abuses"...What abuses, Brain?

You lie, I call you a liar.

You dance to Lennie's stringpulling, I call you Puppetboy.

You act like you know it all when it's evident you know nothing, I
sarcastically call you "Brain". You cringe at that diminuitive, yet you seem
to relish doing it to others in spades.

Sucks to be you, Brain...You're just slightly more transparent than wax
paper, and about as useful.

If all that's true, why bother with it, Steve? AOL has wonderful
newsgroup filters. I only saw this because you responded.

Yes, Steve, why bother? You won't get a QSL card out of it.

Let's clarify a few things. We all know Mr. Burke isn't going to tell
us anything significant about his /T5 operation. It's just the
mechanism for
a shaggy dog story, to involve others without ever getting to the
point or answering a direct question. Check out:

23 Oct 1998

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm... output=gplain

for more info than you've been able to gather in the past few years.

None of this should be a surprise, of course. Some folks don't let
facts get in the way of a good rant:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

You and I are long-time amateurs, who enjoy and use Morse Code, so of
course we're targets of everything certain folks can think up. Worse,
we're Extras with 1x2 calls, which makes it that much worse. We and
our code test are blamed for everything bad that happens in amateur
radio - and credited with nothing that's good.

This was all explained even before I was on rrap:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

Note the date.

Note the date that Bruce began his abusive postings.

Note the date that you first noted his abusive manner.

Note the date that Steve began his abusive postings.

Note that you have yet to make a note of his abusiveness.

Yet you have no problem with claiming that Len or I are "negative."

Hi, hi! Good old PCTA double standard.

Why bother with folks who are so negative, when there's so many good,
fun things to do in ham radio?

Jim, this isn't ham radio.

I'd be perfectly pleased if Steve were to spend all of his spare time
actually playing radio commando instead of abusing people on here.

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine? Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine. Can you explain this?

In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.
You have not had a problem
with others' anonymity, as
long as they agreed with you.

You have no problem with the
anonymity of "Leo" or "Vipul".

But in our case, you are far
more interested in who we
are than in what we have to say.

That is very interesting.

Can you explain this?

No.

Perhaps 'Steve' respects our
anonymity. Perhaps he has
changed.

Can you explain why you
respect only the anonymity of
those who agree with you?

Can you explain why you
seek to aggravate someone
you have described as "nuts"?

(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

I wrote of you in the past tense, not us. Welcome back, Jim.

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.

I merely wished to reduce spam at my original e-mail account, and
it has worked. You can and will read nefarious intent into any of my
actions. Regardless, my posting style has not changed and anyone who
asks will be told who I am.

Can you explain this?

No.

Perhaps 'Steve' respects our
anonymity. Perhaps he has
changed.

Steve only changes when he goes on his meds, and when he goes off
his meds.

Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: (William)
Date: 8/21/2004 6:23 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

I wrote of you in the past tense, not us. Welcome back, Jim.

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.

I merely wished to reduce spam at my original e-mail account, and
it has worked.

Suuuuuuuuuuure you did, Brain.. Sure.

You can and will read nefarious intent into any of my actions.

So far your actions say "liar", "poor self esteem" and "no self respect"

Regardless, my posting style has not changed and anyone who
asks will be told who I am.

Yes, your "posting style" HAS changed. You became far more vile,
antagonizing and mistruthful. This was all after your public announcement of
admiration for another vile, antagonizing and mistruthful RRAP poster.

As for telling anyone who you are, if it really meant anything to you, it
would automatic for you to sign your posts.

You don't. So much for self respect.

Steve, K4YZ

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: (William)
Date: 8/21/2004 6:23 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

I wrote of you in the past tense, not us. Welcome back, Jim.

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.

I merely wished to reduce spam at my original e-mail account, and
it has worked.

Suuuuuuuuuuure you did, Brain.. Sure.

Are you still "Dialing...?"

You can and will read nefarious intent into any of my actions.

So far your actions say "liar", "poor self esteem" and "no self respect"

Regardless, my posting style has not changed and anyone who
asks will be told who I am.

Yes, your "posting style" HAS changed. You became far more vile,
antagonizing and mistruthful. This was all after your public announcement of
admiration for another vile, antagonizing and mistruthful RRAP poster.

As for telling anyone who you are, if it really meant anything to you, it
would automatic for you to sign your posts.

You don't. So much for self respect.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, you're merely a short, chubby, frustrated, middle-aged, sick,
uniform seeking has-been who has been off his medications for far too
long to return to a normal life. You've suffered agonizing personal
loss, and with it much of your humanity. Apparently as a result of
your pain, you lie incessantly, lack self-respect, make insane
statements and accusations, and make an ass of yourself in the name of
Amateur Radio, the Civil Air Patrol, and the Military Affiliated Radio
System. You embarass them and you embarass amateur radio. You
embarass yourself but don't seem to notice.

I have responded to your abuses with a civil tongue for far too long.
You now reap what you sew. When you can respond civilly, using my
correct name, and without calling me a liar, a penis, a homosexual, or
a child molester, you will receive civil replies in kind. A public
apology is warranted as well, but I can forego the apology if I see
you making real progress.

You aren't the avenging angel of amateur radio, and you have no right
to expect that your behavior is acceptable in any forum.

Until you're well, you're not worth responding to. I guess you're
happy enough not being responsible for your actions. Best of Luck on
your road to recovery.

Sayonara, bb

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: (William)
Date: 8/21/2004 6:23 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

I wrote of you in the past tense, not us. Welcome back, Jim.

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.

I merely wished to reduce spam at my original e-mail account, and
it has worked.

Suuuuuuuuuuure you did, Brain.. Sure.

Are you still "Dialing...?"

You can and will read nefarious intent into any of my actions.

So far your actions say "liar", "poor self esteem" and "no self
respect"

Regardless, my posting style has not changed and anyone who
asks will be told who I am.

Yes, your "posting style" HAS changed. You became far more vile,
antagonizing and mistruthful. This was all after your public announcement
of
admiration for another vile, antagonizing and mistruthful RRAP poster.

As for telling anyone who you are, if it really meant anything to you,
it
would automatic for you to sign your posts.

You don't. So much for self respect.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, you're merely a short, chubby, frustrated, middle-aged, sick,
uniform seeking has-been who has been off his medications for far too
long to return to a normal life. You've suffered agonizing personal
loss, and with it much of your humanity. Apparently as a result of
your pain, you lie incessantly, lack self-respect, make insane
statements and accusations, and make an ass of yourself in the name of
Amateur Radio, the Civil Air Patrol, and the Military Affiliated Radio
System. You embarass them and you embarass amateur radio. You
embarass yourself but don't seem to notice.

I have responded to your abuses with a civil tongue for far too long.
You now reap what you sew. When you can respond civilly, using my
correct name, and without calling me a liar, a penis, a homosexual, or
a child molester, you will receive civil replies in kind. A public
apology is warranted as well, but I can forego the apology if I see
you making real progress.

You aren't the avenging angel of amateur radio, and you have no right
to expect that your behavior is acceptable in any forum.

Until you're well, you're not worth responding to. I guess you're
happy enough not being responsible for your actions. Best of Luck on
your road to recovery.

That about sums it up. :-)

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

Until you're well, you're not worth responding to. I guess you're
happy enough not being responsible for your actions. Best of Luck on
your road to recovery.

That about sums it up. :-)



Yep, he can go back to barking at the moon.

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Quitefine) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

And for what it's worth, have you noticed that we used to have an ANON
poster on here going by the "handle" of Quitefine?

Why do you write of
us in the past tense?

I wrote of you in the past tense, not us. Welcome back, Jim.

Steve has an
unnatural attraction for every ANON poster on here EXCEPT for
Quitefine.

It seems that 'Steve' is
not the only one :-) :-)

You and Lenover21 have both
tried to be anonymous here.

I merely wished to reduce spam at my original e-mail account, and
it has worked. You can and will read nefarious intent into any of my
actions. Regardless, my posting style has not changed and anyone who
asks will be told who I am.

Can you explain this?

No.

Perhaps 'Steve' respects our
anonymity. Perhaps he has
changed.

Steve only changes when he goes on his meds, and when he goes off
his meds.

I hope he changes his uniform. The "class A" act was getting old...

Jimmie still hasn't "explained" HIS use of anonymity. shrug

Ham Radio of 2004! All have anonymous calls!

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...

Jimmie still hasn't "explained" HIS use of anonymity. shrug

Ham Radio of 2004! All have anonymous calls!



Don't forget: PCTA Double-Standard.

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...

Jimmie still hasn't "explained" HIS use of anonymity. shrug

Ham Radio of 2004! All have anonymous calls!



Don't forget: PCTA Double-Standard.

Thanks for the reminder! :-)