Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#431
|
|||
|
|||
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... Brian wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... "Jimmie"? If you ever have a future in amateur radio, it will be a short one. You've talked and talked and talked the talk. You've not yet begun to walk the walk. Dave K8MN Hey Dave, what is Quitefine's role in amateur radio? I have no idea. Why not ask him? But Dave, we've got you running around here commenting on people's roles in amateur radio. And we've got Quitefine trying so hard to establish herself as having a role in amateur radio. You don't have me doing anything. I may not "have" you doing it, but you're doing it none-the-less. Feel better? As long as you realize that your "we have you running around" statement is in error. I'm not running at all. I'm sitting in a comfy chair. As to commenting on peoples' roles in amateur radio, they first have to be radio amateurs in order to have a role. Tell me about Quitefine. Is she an amateur? I haven't the slightest idea. I'm not Quitefine. You need to address your question to Quitefine. (Please refer to Jimmy Who's Point Paper that was faxed out late Sunday) Len doesn't have a role in amateur radio. Whether Leonard H. Anderson posts here or doesn't post here, amateur radio goes on. Morse code goes on. Chasing DX goes on. Does it go on with or without Quitefine? It certainly does. So what is Quitefine's role? Unless you're just here to give her a pass. I'm not Quitefine. I'm not Quitesure. Are you Quitesure? Yes. You have a bad habit of directing your questions to the wrong people. Actually, no. Actually, yes you do. You have the bad habit of enabling anonymous people to behave badly, while crying foul with respect to some people who do identify themselves. What are you, Susan Sarandon? Barbra Streisand? I'm not buying your "enabling" scenario. I'm responsible for my actions. You are responsible for your actions. You need to ask Quitefine. You may or may not get an answer. I asked you. That was a poor decision on your part. You keep making the same mistake of seeking information from the wrong source. I won't get an answer because you have a history of enabling bad behavior. working out of band French ops on 6M. You won't get an answer because I'm not the person posting as "Quitefine". French authorities are responsible for what French radio amateurs do. That's been pointed out to you any number of times. It doesn't say much for your intelligence that you've been unable to grasp this basic concept. "Sorry Hans, Working French Hams Out-Of-Band IS JUST LIKE Working French Hams In-Band!" Hans? He isn't involved. He's already advised you that he thinks you're all wet on this one too, "Bill". Dave K8MN |
#433
|
|||
|
|||
|
#434
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dave Heil
writes: William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... Brian wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... "Jimmie"? If you ever have a future in amateur radio, it will be a short one. You've talked and talked and talked the talk. You've not yet begun to walk the walk. Dave K8MN Hey Dave, what is Quitefine's role in amateur radio? I have no idea. Why not ask him? But Dave, we've got you running around here commenting on people's roles in amateur radio. And we've got Quitefine trying so hard to establish herself as having a role in amateur radio. You don't have me doing anything. I may not "have" you doing it, but you're doing it none-the-less. Feel better? As long as you realize that your "we have you running around" statement is in error. I'm not running at all. I'm sitting in a comfy chair. As to commenting on peoples' roles in amateur radio, they first have to be radio amateurs in order to have a role. Tell me about Quitefine. Is she an amateur? I haven't the slightest idea. I'm not Quitefine. You need to address your question to Quitefine. Why do you talk about that non-entity so much? She isn't involved in amateur radio...no verifiable amateur license. One has to be INVOLVED BY LICENSING according to your magnificent rules. (Please refer to Jimmy Who's Point Paper that was faxed out late Sunday) Len doesn't have a role in amateur radio. Whether Leonard H. Anderson posts here or doesn't post here, amateur radio goes on. Morse code goes on. Chasing DX goes on. Does it go on with or without Quitefine? It certainly does. See? There you are talking about a non-entity NOT INVOLVED. Tsk. So what is Quitefine's role? Unless you're just here to give her a pass. I'm not Quitefine. I'm not Quitesure. Are you Quitesure? Yes. You have a bad habit of directing your questions to the wrong people. Actually, no. Actually, yes you do. You have the bad habit of enabling anonymous people to behave badly, while crying foul with respect to some people who do identify themselves. What are you, Susan Sarandon? Barbra Streisand? I'm not buying your "enabling" scenario. I'm responsible for my actions. You are responsible for your actions. But everyone in amateur radio MUST BE INVOLVED under your rules. You don't run amateur radio. You are not an authority. You need to ask Quitefine. You may or may not get an answer. I asked you. That was a poor decision on your part. You keep making the same mistake of seeking information from the wrong source. You have RULES and seek to rule over others that you don't like. That must mean you like this Quitefine. (does your wife know this?) Prove Quitefine's INVOLVEMENT through licensing in amateur radio. I won't get an answer because you have a history of enabling bad behavior. working out of band French ops on 6M. You won't get an answer because I'm not the person posting as "Quitefine". Everyone KNEW that. :-) Quitefine doesn't have an SS uniform and doesn't imitate Otto Preminger. French authorities are responsible for what French radio amateurs do. That's been pointed out to you any number of times. It doesn't say much for your intelligence that you've been unable to grasp this basic concept. Tsk, tsk. Heil has NOT been grasping that I'm NOT grasping after any amateur license. I've had a commercial/professional license for 48 years. I'm just advocating the elimination of the useless morse code test for any radio operator licensing. You can't...or won't...grasp that simple fact. You blither on in an arrogant, accusatory tone about "not being involved in radio due to not having an amateur radio license." That's bull****, Heil, an artificiality you manufactured to try to win message points in here. I've enabled my professional career. I just went ahead and did it. And retired from regular hours. "No matter what job, educational level, employer, or government/military service that anyone has, if said anyone opposes Heil's views, he/she will be the target of Heil's insults, ridicule, name-calling, factual errors, ethnic slurs, total lack of emoticons and social-interaction graces, acting in an arrogant, elitist manner...for years" :-) |
#435
|
|||
|
|||
These are the number of unexpired FCC ARS
licenses held by individuals on the dates listed: As of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 Technician - 205,394 Technician Plus - 128,860 General - 112,677 Advanced - 99,782 Extra - 78,750 Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 Total all classes - 674,792 As of September 4, 2004: Novice - 30,510 (decrease of 18,819) Technician - 263,752 (increase of 58,358) Technician Plus - 57,119 (decrease of 71,741) General - 139,064 (increase of 26,387) Advanced - 78,968 (decrease of 20,814) Extra - 105,739 (increase of 26,989) Total Tech/TechPlus - 320,871 (decrease of 13,383) Total all classes - 675,152 (increase of 360) 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#436
|
|||
|
|||
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: Dave Heil wrote in message ... "Jimmie"? If you ever have a future in amateur radio, it will be a short one. You've talked and talked and talked the talk. You've not yet begun to walk the walk. Dave K8MN Hey Dave, what is Quitefine's role in amateur radio? Robust oberst not know, passes da buck. No committment in messaging... :-) Or, he too busy walking and talking, not listening... Walking and chewing gum at same time without tripping or biting his tongue. ***** All kidding aside, "William", it is nearly 41 years that I've been licensed as a radio amateur. I've made no empty brags about getting an "Extra right out of the box". I just did it. ***** Wow! You got an Extra right out of the box? That should be easily verifiable. No other intervening licenses? Wow! That IS impressive! Imagine...a whole 41 years as an AMATEUR! Dave "just did it" WRT getting "Extra right out of the box." Sounds to me like he just said he's been an Extra for almost 41 years, but then he posts this on the QRZ website: "First licensed: WN8LET 1963, Oak Hill, WV." But you won't see Steve in here yelling "Liar, liar pants on fiar!" or making homosexual and/or pedophile inuendo. Maybe he's already talked to Dave's wife? |
#437
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: Dave Heil wrote in message ... "Jimmie"? If you ever have a future in amateur radio, it will be a short one. You've talked and talked and talked the talk. You've not yet begun to walk the walk. Dave K8MN Hey Dave, what is Quitefine's role in amateur radio? Robust oberst not know, passes da buck. No committment in messaging... :-) Or, he too busy walking and talking, not listening... Walking and chewing gum at same time without tripping or biting his tongue. ***** All kidding aside, "William", it is nearly 41 years that I've been licensed as a radio amateur. I've made no empty brags about getting an "Extra right out of the box". I just did it. ***** Wow! You got an Extra right out of the box? That should be easily verifiable. No other intervening licenses? Wow! That IS impressive! Imagine...a whole 41 years as an AMATEUR! Dave "just did it" WRT getting "Extra right out of the box." Sounds to me like he just said he's been an Extra for almost 41 years, but then he posts this on the QRZ website: "First licensed: WN8LET 1963, Oak Hill, WV." But you won't see Steve in here yelling "Liar, liar pants on fiar!" or making homosexual and/or pedophile inuendo. Maybe he's already talked to Dave's wife? "Quitefine" (J. P. Miccolis) must have lectured everyone on the subject. As long as all agree that PCTA extras "know what is best for all," they are happy and content. Let anyone disagree with PCTA extras, even the slightest, and there is a cacaphony of phony screen names with unusual spacing. :-) Dave approves of Steve's behavior. Miccolis approves of Steve's behavior...despite a once-in-a-while slap on the wrist with a wet hankie. Steve approves of Steve's behavior...which isn't saying much because all his personalities live in a different elsewhere and they are all more-or-less sociopathic. shrug "Quitefine" (James P. Miccolis) approves of der uber-oberst Heil because he is another PCTA extra. Snarling is allowed. Nasty- grams are allowed. All is allowed. As long as they agree that morse code testing must stay. Forever. Independent thought is allowed in here, even cherished, as long as the independency doesn't deviate from established norms of olde-tyme hamme raddio. Their theme music might just as well be "We all live in a brown sub-marine..." :-) |
#438
|
|||
|
|||
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
Independent thought is allowed in here, even cherished, as long as the independency doesn't deviate from established norms of olde-tyme hamme raddio. Their theme music might just as well be "We all live in a brown sub-marine..." :-) Maybe we should pull a Cecil, switch horses, and be part of the in-crowd. I wonder if Steve will still focus on male genitalia, homosexuality, and pedophilia? I certainly hope that that kind of thinking is his independent thoughts and not a trait shared by all PCTA. |
#439
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... Brian wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... "Jimmie"? If you ever have a future in amateur radio, it will be a short one. You've talked and talked and talked the talk. You've not yet begun to walk the walk. Dave K8MN Hey Dave, what is Quitefine's role in amateur radio? I have no idea. Why not ask him? But Dave, we've got you running around here commenting on people's roles in amateur radio. And we've got Quitefine trying so hard to establish herself as having a role in amateur radio. You don't have me doing anything. I may not "have" you doing it, but you're doing it none-the-less. Feel better? As long as you realize that your "we have you running around" statement is in error. As long as you realize that you're running around commenting on people's roles in amateur radio. I'm not running at all. I'm sitting in a comfy chair. As to commenting on peoples' roles in amateur radio, they first have to be radio amateurs in order to have a role. Tell me about Quitefine. Is she an amateur? I haven't the slightest idea. No? You appear to have ideas about quite a number of things, yet you draw a blank on this one. I just don't believe that. I'm not Quitefine. Are you Quitesure? You need to address your question to Quitefine. Clue: I get to decide what I need to do. (Please refer to Jimmy Who's Point Paper that was faxed out late Sunday) Len doesn't have a role in amateur radio. Whether Leonard H. Anderson posts here or doesn't post here, amateur radio goes on. Morse code goes on. Chasing DX goes on. Does it go on with or without Quitefine? It certainly does. Yet you choose to make daily statements to Len that it goes on without him, but are (almost) silent when it comes to Quitefine. Perhaps Quitefine has made contributions to Ham Radio magazine. Perhaps you have, too. So what is Quitefine's role? Unless you're just here to give her a pass. I'm not Quitefine. I'm not Quitesure. Are you Quitesure? Yes. Great! Another alias. At least you admit to it. You have a bad habit of directing your questions to the wrong people. Actually, no. Actually, yes you do. Why are you the wrong person? You seem to have so many opinions about so many things, but draw a blank on this one. Hi, hi. You even hold the opinion, stated above, that amateur radio, morse code, and chasing dx go on without Quitefine. Yet you haven't the "slightest idea" whether Quitefine is an amateur or not. You have the bad habit of enabling anonymous people to behave badly, while crying foul with respect to some people who do identify themselves. What are you, Susan Sarandon? Barbra Streisand? No. I am bb. I'm not buying your "enabling" scenario. I'm responsible for my actions. You certainly are. You are responsible for your own "Good Amateur Practice." You are responsible for your actions. I certainly am. I have always been responsible for my actions. You need to ask Quitefine. You may or may not get an answer. I asked you. That was a poor decision on your part. You keep making the same mistake of seeking information from the wrong source. I've made mistakes before, probably will again. How about you? I won't get an answer because you have a history of enabling bad behavior. working out of band French ops on 6M. You won't get an answer because I'm not the person posting as "Quitefine". I never thought that you were the person posting as Quitefine. French authorities are responsible for what French radio amateurs do. French -radio amateurs- are responsible for what they do, not the French communications authorities. And you are responsible for what you do. You can choose to use "Good Amateur Practice" or not. Although Riley says that "Good Amateur Practice" is enforceable, you were lucky that you were operating under a Tanzanian permit and not subject to U.S. enforcement. That's been pointed out to you any number of times. Many things have been pointed out to me any number of times. They are often wrong. It doesn't say much for your intelligence that you've been unable to grasp this basic concept. To think that French communication authorities are responsible for out of band French amateurs and you carrying on on six meters is absurd. Did they send you a nice QSL card? "Sorry Hans, Working French Hams Out-Of-Band IS JUST LIKE Working French Hams In-Band!" Hans? He isn't involved. He's already advised you that he thinks you're all wet on this one too, "Bill". Dave K8MN Not a problem. As I pointed out above, many things have been pointed out to me any number of times. They are often wrong. So, do you also have an opinion of Blackguard Vox Deus? |
#440
|
|||
|
|||
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... Brian wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... Hey Dave, what is Quitefine's role in amateur radio? I have no idea. Why not ask him? But Dave, we've got you running around here commenting on people's roles in amateur radio. And we've got Quitefine trying so hard to establish herself as having a role in amateur radio. You don't have me doing anything. I may not "have" you doing it, but you're doing it none-the-less. Feel better? As long as you realize that your "we have you running around" statement is in error. As long as you realize that you're running around commenting on people's roles in amateur radio. That's not correct. As I've already mentioned below, I'm not running around. I'm not running at all. I'm sitting in a comfy chair. As to commenting on peoples' roles in amateur radio, they first have to be radio amateurs in order to have a role. Tell me about Quitefine. Is she an amateur? I haven't the slightest idea. No? You appear to have ideas about quite a number of things, yet you draw a blank on this one. I just don't believe that. You don't believe that I have no idea about the background of someone who has not been identified? You sound awfully silly, "William". You need to address your question to Quitefine. Clue: I get to decide what I need to do. Okay, decide. If you persist in asking me about "Quitefine", you'll only look sillier. Len doesn't have a role in amateur radio. Whether Leonard H. Anderson posts here or doesn't post here, amateur radio goes on. Morse code goes on. Chasing DX goes on. Does it go on with or without Quitefine? It certainly does. Yet you choose to make daily statements to Len that it goes on without him, but are (almost) silent when it comes to Quitefine. Perhaps Quitefine has made contributions to Ham Radio magazine. Perhaps you have, too. Almost silent? I don't ever hear anything when I'm reading posts to these newsgroups. Do you hear voices? I don't know anything about "Quitefine". Perhaps he/she has made contributions to the defunt "Ham Radio" magazine. I've not done so. I wrote for "Ham Radio Horizons" and "CQ" and did cartoons for "Radiosporting". So what is Quitefine's role? Unless you're just here to give her a pass. I'm not Quitefine. You have a bad habit of directing your questions to the wrong people. Actually, no. Actually, yes you do. Why are you the wrong person? That would seem evident to all but you. I'm not "Quitefine" and I have no knowledge of "Quitefine". Why do you find that so difficult to accept? You seem to have so many opinions about so many things, but draw a blank on this one. Hi, hi. I'm not "Quitefine" and I have no knowledge of "Quitefine". Why do you find that so difficult to accept? You even hold the opinion, stated above, that amateur radio, morse code, and chasing dx go on without Quitefine. That should be obvious, even to you. Yet you haven't the "slightest idea" whether Quitefine is an amateur or not. What does it matter for the purposes of my statement? You have the bad habit of enabling anonymous people to behave badly, while crying foul with respect to some people who do identify themselves. What are you, Susan Sarandon? Barbra Streisand? No. I am bb. Oh! I apologize "Beebee", I was under the impression that you were "William". I'm not buying your "enabling" scenario. I'm responsible for my actions. You certainly are. You are responsible for your own "Good Amateur Practice." That's correct. You are responsible for your actions. I certainly am. I have always been responsible for my actions. Yes, you have. You need to ask Quitefine. You may or may not get an answer. I asked you. That was a poor decision on your part. You keep making the same mistake of seeking information from the wrong source. I've made mistakes before, probably will again. How about you? I'm not known for making the same one over and over and over again. I won't get an answer because you have a history of enabling bad behavior. working out of band French ops on 6M. You won't get an answer because I'm not the person posting as "Quitefine". I never thought that you were the person posting as Quitefine. Then why would you continue to ask me for information when I've advised that I know nothing of the person posting as "Quitefine"? French authorities are responsible for what French radio amateurs do. French -radio amateurs- are responsible for what they do, not the French communications authorities. Yes, you're right. The French authorities are charged with taking action against those French ops who violate French regs. And you are responsible for what you do. I've already stated as much. I'm not French and I broke no French, Tanzanian or American amateur radio regs. You can choose to use "Good Amateur Practice" or not. Although Riley says that "Good Amateur Practice" is enforceable, you were lucky that you were operating under a Tanzanian permit and not subject to U.S. enforcement. You're back to being silly again, "T5/William". I broke no Tanzanian regs and I broke no U.S. regs. Some French ops apparently broke French amateur radio regulations. Their government is responsible for any action to be taken against them. Have you contacted the French authorities yet to protest the outrageous behavior of French scofflaw hams? Maybe you'd like to initiate an "amateur radio war crimes" complaint so that a tribunal can be formed. That's been pointed out to you any number of times. Many things have been pointed out to me any number of times. They are often wrong. Your problems often begin because you fail to see the difference. It doesn't say much for your intelligence that you've been unable to grasp this basic concept. To think that French communication authorities are responsible for out of band French amateurs and you carrying on on six meters is absurd. You got part of it right. The part where you understood that the French had any sway over my operations from Tanzania is absurd. The part where French radio amateurs are out of their assigned frequency allocations and that French communications authorities are responsible for taking any action against them is not absurd at all. Did they send you a nice QSL card? Of whom are you writing? "Sorry Hans, Working French Hams Out-Of-Band IS JUST LIKE Working French Hams In-Band!" Hans? He isn't involved. He's already advised you that he thinks you're all wet on this one too, "Bill". Not a problem. As I pointed out above, many things have been pointed out to me any number of times. They are often wrong. Let me know how this one turns out, Farnsworth. So, do you also have an opinion of Blackguard Vox Deus? An opinion? Earlier you asked me if "Quitefine" is a radio amateur and about his/her role in amateur radio. As with "Quitefine", I'm not sure of the gender of "Blackguard Vox Deus" or whether he/she is a radio amateur. My *opinion* is that "Blackguard" doesn't care much for Len. I can understand that. Feel free to carry on with your James Carville impersonation. Dave K8MN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
First BPL License Awarded - | Boatanchors | |||
First BPL License Awarded - | Boatanchors |