Len Over 21 wrote:

Der uber-oberst fills in blanks with pencil smudges...

Brian, you do NOT get to decide anything with der uber-oberst's
blessing and authoritative approval.

That factum is at the top of der uber-oberst's Orders of das Day.

"Quitefine" (James p. Miccolis) didn't praise the "foreign service"
veteran's illustrious service in Guinea-Bisseau...surprising that
der uber-oberst didn't blow the straps of his jack boots at that
slight. :-)

Der uber-oberst IS the "right" person!

Everyone else makes errors. Der uber-oberst never does.

Doesn't matter. If der uber-oberst approves, that is that!

Der uber-oberst IS amateur good practice!

NOT without der uber-oberst's authoritative approval!

Der uber-oberst NEVER makes mistakes!

He is a PCTA extra.
That explains it all...

Der uber-oberst is responsible for ALL U.S. amateur radio!
[he sure acts like it...]

"Foreign Service" employees are not subject to U.S. enforcement.
They've been diplomatically immunized. :-)

Probably did...in a diplomatic pouch. :-)

Der uber-oberst will insist that BVD be contacted direct.

Der uber-oberst heartily approves of anyone - even phonies - taking
down "Enemies of the State" (in his perception).


"Ergo, all you can play is the hand with the personal denigrations
cards. You keep losing."

--Leonard H. Anderson

What can I say about your typical behavior here except to ask:
"are you having too much fun peeing in the pool?"
--Leonard H. Anderson

Dave K8MN

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

What can I say about your typical behavior here except to ask:
"are you having too much fun peeing in the pool?"
--Leonard H. Anderson

Tsk. You still haven't answered any questions.

Too hard for you? :-)

How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and
those on the www.hamdata.com site?

[the thread subject is "ARS License Numbers"]

No doubt Quitefine MUST jump in here to "defend his honor" or
whatever he thinks makes him always right... :-)

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

What can I say about your typical behavior here except to ask:
"are you having too much fun peeing in the pool?"
--Leonard H. Anderson

Tsk. You still haven't answered any questions.

Too hard for you? :-)

Double Tsk. You still haven't passed an amateur radio exam at any
level.
Too hard for you? :-)

How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and
those on the www.hamdata.com site?

Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com.

[the thread subject is "ARS License Numbers"]

Would you really like me to go back through google and come up with the
total number of your posts to the thread which are on topic?

No doubt Quitefine MUST jump in here to "defend his honor" or
whatever he thinks makes him always right... :-)

Are you speaking from experience, Lennie boy? :-)

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote in message ...

How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and
those on the www.hamdata.com site?

Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com.

Whoever "Quitefine" may be, he/she/they haven't posted any ARS license
numbers here.

I have, for some time now.

The difference between the license totals I post and those at
"hamdata" is this:

The hamdata numbers are the entire current database, including expired
licenses in the grace period, club licenses, RACES licenses, etc.

The numbers I post are only the currently active licenses held by
individuals. No clubs, no RACES, no expired-but-in-the-grace-period
licenses, etc.

These facts are all explained in the posts and on the website in
question.

Both sets of numbers are "right" as long as you keep in mind what they
include.

Just clarifying the facts.

73 de Jim, N2EY

N2EY wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message ...

How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and
those on the www.hamdata.com site?

Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com.

Whoever "Quitefine" may be, he/she/they haven't posted any ARS license
numbers here.

I have, for some time now.

The difference between the license totals I post and those at
"hamdata" is this:

The hamdata numbers are the entire current database, including expired
licenses in the grace period, club licenses, RACES licenses, etc.

The numbers I post are only the currently active licenses held by
individuals. No clubs, no RACES, no expired-but-in-the-grace-period
licenses, etc.

These facts are all explained in the posts and on the website in
question.

Both sets of numbers are "right" as long as you keep in mind what they
include.

Just clarifying the facts.

I could have sworn that you'd explained all of that for Leonard's
benefit at least on a couple of previous occasions.

How could he have confused your postings of the license figures with
"Quitefine"?

Dave K8MN

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

N2EY wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message
...

How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and
those on the www.hamdata.com site?

Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com.

Whoever "Quitefine" may be, he/she/they haven't posted any ARS license
numbers here.

I have, for some time now.

The difference between the license totals I post and those at
"hamdata" is this:

The hamdata numbers are the entire current database, including expired
licenses in the grace period, club licenses, RACES licenses, etc.

The numbers I post are only the currently active licenses held by
individuals. No clubs, no RACES, no expired-but-in-the-grace-period
licenses, etc.

These facts are all explained in the posts and on the website in
question.

Both sets of numbers are "right" as long as you keep in mind what they
include.

Just clarifying the facts.

I could have sworn that you'd explained all of that for Leonard's
benefit at least on a couple of previous occasions.

More than a couple. Mr. Anderson sometimes has trouble with the interpretation
of facts. For example, he still has trouble with the fact that FCC has been
renewing Tech Pluses as Techs for 4-1/2 years....

He also seems to have a lot of trouble with recalling certain past events, like
when Cecil, W6RCA/W5DXP, participated in rrap and on the air.

For the record, in chronological order:

1) Cecil held W6RCA and worked for Intel
2) He retired from Intel and moved back to Texas, in part to care for aging
relatives
3) He participated in the 7037 get-together
4) He and I ran antenna tests on 40 CW, checking his vertical against his
all-band linear-tuner dipole
4) He got his old W5DXP call back

Somewhere in that sequence, he decided that rather than dropping the code test
completely, he was satisfied with 5 wpm. He resigned his NCI membership and
decreased his rrap participation to near-zero.

Mr. Anderson has it all mixed up, as usual. Not my problem, though.

How could he have confused your postings of the license figures with
"Quitefine"?

I don't know. Ask *him*.

---

btw, thinking of departed rrap folk, it occurred to me that I probably hold the
record for most rrapper's QSO'd. Anybody beat this list?:

K8MN
W4NTI
K0HB
AC6XG
K3LT
K4YZ
W3RV
W6RCA
W0EX
WA2SI

73 de Jim, N2EY

73 de Jim, N2EY

N2EY wrote:

btw, thinking of departed rrap folk, it occurred to me that I probably hold the
record for most rrapper's QSO'd. Anybody beat this list?:

K8MN
W4NTI
K0HB
AC6XG
K3LT
K4YZ
W3RV
W6RCA
W0EX
WA2SI

73 de Jim, N2EY

I think you have the record. I've worked four from the list and you.

Dave K8MN

Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: Dave Heil
Date: 9/11/2004 10:26 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

N2EY wrote:

Just clarifying the facts.

I could have sworn that you'd explained all of that for Leonard's
benefit at least on a couple of previous occasions.

How could he have confused your postings of the license figures with
"Quitefine"?

Being an idiot helps.

73

Steve, K4YZ

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...

Being an idiot helps.

73

Steve, K4YZ

Looks like you've had numerous helpings.