"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , Dwight Stewart
writes:

Larry, I seriously doubt Hollingsworth would have said anything if he
had
known his words would be used as a basis for your harassment of Kim over
this subject for several years.

Dwight:

If that's the case, then he would have to blame Kim for that outcome, not
me. After all, it was Kim who quoted Riley's comments made in a
private E-mail in this public newsgroup, thereby making them public
domain and subject to being used against her in the future.


Being used "against" me? You are hilarious, Larry. I thought you said your
posts were intellectual and logical.


If I were her,
I would not have done that. However, Kim was eager to make the point
that she had a legal, Constitutional "right" to choose her call sign, such
as
it is.


Yeah, and you apparently don't like it.


In his reply, Mr. Hollingsworth assured Kim that she did, indeed have
that "right," but the exercise thereof was potentially harmful to the
image
of the ARS, to the extent that he predicted that it had the potential to
take
the ARS ".one step closer to extinction."


You'll note, Larry, that by your own post of the words from Riley, he's
quite capable of something you are not: being a gentleman and democratic
about his--"HIS"--personal opinion. Anyone is entitled to their opinion,
Larry, even you. However, you'll also note that Riley never went beyond
making a statement on his own personal opinion.


Kim's act of hubris, in making the attempt to get a well-known authority
to validate her action, has backfired on her in a most inconvenient way.
If Mr. Hollingsworth has any objection to the way his words are being
utilized, he needs to take that matter up with Kim, not me.


You dumb-ass, Larry. I did not try to "make" Riley validate anything. You
completely missed the point that was done for.


You've never been admonished by Hollingsworth simply because you've
never
had the guts to tell him what you're doing.

Mr. Hollingsworth has the same access to this newsgroup as anyone else.
If he wanted to do anything about it, he certainly has the technology to
do so. Should he contact me with the request that I desist in using his
quote in the manner in which I have been doing, I will certainly comply.
However, this would not absolve Kim of her responsibility for introducing
Mr. Hollingsworth's words to this public forum.


Again, Riley would never request that someone desist anything; while he is
offering his own personal opinions. He likely would caution that you are as
destructive, if not more than, as I to the ARS. My callsign, in my opinion,
is not destructive to the ARS. My opinion is as valid as Riley's, yours, or
anyone else's.


So, since Kim was willing to
contact Hollingsworth over the choice of her callsign (her behavior), why
don't you contact Hollingsworth to ask if he feels your behavior (your
use
of his words to publicly harass Kim for all this time) has any effect on
Ham
Radio?

For the simple reason that my behavior is not in question here. Kim is
not
being "harassed." She is merely experiencing the justified reaction to an
action she took which is potentially harmful to the image of the ARS, and
that is my right


You give yourself way too much importance, Larry. I am not experiencing
anything but humor at your ignorance and desperate attempt to be right.


-- just as it was Kim's "right" to self-select a call sign
with
a vulgar, sexualized, and demeaning connotation which reflects poorly on
YL radio amateurs everywhere. As someone else put it in another posting,
if her call sign had been issued as a sequential assignment, then this
whole matter would not be at issue.


More at issue is your destructive attitude toward the ARS by being such an
idiot, Larry.


Kim deliberately chose that call sign
in order for it to have the effect of generating attention to herself, and
to
stir up controversy. Well, it worked -- and now she is responsible for
any and all consequences appertaining to her action.


That is your interpretation of why I have this callsign, Larry.


As for whether my "behavior" will have any affect on ham radio, I
certainly hope so. I happen to be expressing my vehement and
determined opposition to an action by a radio amateur which has the
potential to do serious damage to the image of the ARS. By doing
so, I hope to send the message that behavior such as Kim's is not
to be tolerated.

73 de Larry, K3LT


Good grief, Larry. Your "behavior" is despicable. The only message you
send is one of idiocy.

And, I seem to recall that I told you when you had something intelligent and
logical to say that you'd see me responding to you. I've seen nothing
intelligent and logical yet--and I've given you every opportunity. So,
you'll see nothing from me again until you have something intelligent and
logical. Every time that is requested, you act like a fly on **** with the
callsign issue. Not intellectual, not logical.

You can't do it, can you?

Kim W5TIT