| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
July 4th 03, 10:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
N2EY wrote:
The restructuring R&O made it clear, IMHO, that the one and only reason FCC kept Element 1 was the treaty requirement. It would be illogical for FCC to keep Element 1 now that there's no more treaty requirement. Even though we're talking govt. regulations, I can't imagine FCC being that illogical and reversing itself. If it's the same people in charge at the FCC, yes. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Using a Pool Cage As an Antenna? | Antenna | |||
| Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
| From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
| REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||
| REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||
Threaded Mode
