In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Don't hold your breath, Mike. I'm not sure I've ever seen that Larry
has
met a chall....sched yet.

Kim:

I "challenge" you to a schedule on 20-meter PSK-31. Put up or shut up!
BTW -- I know you're a Tech, so simply have your OM (a General) serve
as control op! Perfectly legal Third-Party operation. The ball is in
YOUR
court now -- so no excuses! You started this, now show us all that you
have any credibility whatsoever. If you squirm out of this QSO
challenge,
you will forever be self-nullified in this NG.

73 de Larry, K3LT

Hmmm, so far, not a peep out of Kim! I hope it's because she's busily
preparing her PSK-31 station for our QSO!

73 de Larry, K3LT


Larry, that's the first time I've ever seen that challenge. I've seen the
thread, but could not find the original challenge to know what it was. I
actually thought it was something Steve had said.

I don't care to meet your challenge, Larry, and I am not the one who has
solicited challenges in the past. As I understand it, by looking here only,
I've never seen anyone say that their challenge to you (mostly on a CW
sched) was ever realized.

Kim:

Scroll up. You're the one who said you've never seen that I had met a
chall[enge] or a sked. So I offered one. If you refuse my challenge
for a PSK-31 sked, then you've gotta do the right thing and take back
what you said about me. However, as usual, I'm not holding my
breath.

Oh, and the PSK-31 station is established (when the radio would be set back
up), because my hubby really likes that mode.

So, what's the problem? I can get my station set back up in 10 minutes.
However, for your convenience, I'll leave my challenge open indefinitely.

73 de Larry, K3LT

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Don't hold your breath, Mike. I'm not sure I've ever seen that Larry
has
met a chall....sched yet.

Kim:

I "challenge" you to a schedule on 20-meter PSK-31. Put up or shut
up!
BTW -- I know you're a Tech, so simply have your OM (a General) serve
as control op! Perfectly legal Third-Party operation. The ball is in
YOUR
court now -- so no excuses! You started this, now show us all that
you
have any credibility whatsoever. If you squirm out of this QSO
challenge,
you will forever be self-nullified in this NG.

73 de Larry, K3LT

Hmmm, so far, not a peep out of Kim! I hope it's because she's busily
preparing her PSK-31 station for our QSO!

73 de Larry, K3LT


Larry, that's the first time I've ever seen that challenge. I've seen
the
thread, but could not find the original challenge to know what it was. I
actually thought it was something Steve had said.

I don't care to meet your challenge, Larry, and I am not the one who has
solicited challenges in the past. As I understand it, by looking here
only,
I've never seen anyone say that their challenge to you (mostly on a CW
sched) was ever realized.

Kim:

Scroll up. You're the one who said you've never seen that I had met a
chall[enge] or a sked. So I offered one. If you refuse my challenge
for a PSK-31 sked, then you've gotta do the right thing and take back
what you said about me. However, as usual, I'm not holding my
breath.

Oh, and the PSK-31 station is established (when the radio would be set
back
up), because my hubby really likes that mode.

So, what's the problem? I can get my station set back up in 10 minutes.
However, for your convenience, I'll leave my challenge open indefinitely.

73 de Larry, K3LT


No, you scroll up. I said, "I'm not sure I've ever seen that Larry has met
a chall....sched yet." That means that when you have been challenged to
meet a sched, I have not seen evidence that you have ever met one. I did
not challenge you, never have challenged you.

*Have you ever met a sched that was offered here?*

Now, if you want to turn that around to making it look like I am challenging
you, that's fine.

Kim W5TIT


---
Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net
Complaints to

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

So, what's the problem? I can get my station set back up in 10 minutes.
However, for your convenience, I'll leave my challenge open indefinitely.

73 de Larry, K3LT


No, you scroll up. I said, "I'm not sure I've ever seen that Larry has met
a chall....sched yet." That means that when you have been challenged to
meet a sched, I have not seen evidence that you have ever met one. I did
not challenge you, never have challenged you.

Kim:

No, all you did was make a speculative comment that I have failed to
meet challenges or schedules with my fellow hams and rrap participants.
Now, you obviously felt a need to make that comment, so please share
with us, what was the reason? After all, you implied something
negative about me, so there MUST be some reason for you to do that.

*Have you ever met a sched that was offered here?*

Now, if you want to turn that around to making it look like I am challenging
you, that's fine.

I haven't turned anything around, Kim. All I did was offer you a challenge
to a PSK-31 sked. After all, you apparently had no faith in my ability to
meet the challenge/sked, so I am now offering you the "proof" you seem
to require. If you don't want to take me up on my challenge, then that
means that you think that you can accuse me of never doing so, but then
not permit me to offer evidence to the contrary. I must assume, then, that
you are backing off of your allegation, and are now going to offer your
apology for having made it. Ahem…feel free to proceed.

73 de Larry, K3LT