LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 20th 03, 03:54 AM
Larry Roll K3LT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Kim:

One hundred percent of my postings provide what you call "literate,
logical, and intelligent" arguments for you and others to respond to in
the same manner.


Now, Larry, if that were true, then we'd be having intelligent communication
rather than this blather. You are about as bright as a 2-watt light bulb.


Yet, you usually just toss dismissive one-liners,
or, just a simple "ROFLMAO." You have never demonstrated any
capability to produce "literate, logical, or intelligent" commentary in
this newsgroup whatsoever.


The reason you have missed it is because you are incapable of recognizing
anything intelligent, Larry. Like I said you're about as bright as a 2-watt
lightbulb.


And it's not just my postings which you
seem incapable of dealing with in an intelligent manner. You are
universally childish, immature, and just plain dumb in all of your
replies to each and every participant in this newsgroup -- and this
includes those with which you merely indicate agreement and call
it "participation."


You are not worthy to judge my posts, Larry. They are far superior to your
poor intellect.


Kim:

You are truly amazing. Amazingly predictable, that is. In this last round
of responses, all you've done is prove me right by simply parroting things
I've already said -- about you! No original thought whatsoever. Nothing
new, nothing original. Ever.

You are so completely out of your intellectual depth that it is truly
a sad thing to witness on a daily basis. Have you no pride, woman?

73 de Larry, K3LT


Well, at least you can spell the word "intellectual." Now, could you start
practicing it? Go ahead, challenge me. I'd like to see something
intelligent from you for a change. When you do that, I will respond in
kind...


Ok, Kim, that's easy. Please provide a logical, rational, and convincing
argument justifying your call sign, giving proof that it is not demeaning
to women, and that it cannot possibly give a negative image of amateur
radio operators to the general public, including adults who are concerned
about the exposure of young children, particularly young boys, to things
which tend to create negative sexual stereotypes.

I hope this is "intelligent" enough for you. Quite frankly, I don't think you
can handle it. Prove me wrong, if you can.

73 de Larry, K3LT

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noise and Loops Question Tony Angerame Antenna 4 August 24th 04 10:12 PM
Stacking Distance Question. More Information ab5mm Antenna 8 June 5th 04 08:18 AM
Stupid question G5RV Ken Bessler Antenna 17 January 9th 04 12:06 PM
QEI INC. QUINDAR RADIO UNIT TELEMETRY QUESTION got from hamfest john private smith General 0 November 22nd 03 04:19 AM
Question about attenuators ... Doug McLaren Antenna 2 August 31st 03 04:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017