In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Ok, Kim, that's easy. Please provide a logical, rational, and convincing
argument justifying your call sign, giving proof that it is not demeaning
to women, and that it cannot possibly give a negative image of amateur
radio operators to the general public, including adults who are concerned
about the exposure of young children, particularly young boys, to things
which tend to create negative sexual stereotypes.

I hope this is "intelligent" enough for you. Quite frankly, I don't think
you
can handle it. Prove me wrong, if you can.

73 de Larry, K3LT


I got one for you, Larry. Here we go: the next time I see something logical
and intellectual from you, I'll respond, OK?

Kim W5TIT

Kim:

You haven't responded to anything ANYONE has said that is "logical and
intellectual," so why should you start now? You'll just do what you always
do, such as with my "challenge" offered in this thread. You'll simply
dismiss it, without making an effort to take it seriously. No, AFAIC, there
is never going to be a "next time" as far as YOU'RE concerned. You
cannot handle me, and you know it; therefore, you simply run home to
Momma whenever the going gets rough. Care to prove me wrong?
Respond to my challenge. It's as simple as that.

73 de Larry, K3LT