Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:20:53 -0600, Rod Anderson wrote:
Sorry Dan you and the ARRL forgot to consider the affect of Americans with Disabilities law, The only reason that the courts have not thrown out the code requirement is the international treaty required it, the treaty overuled US laws. Keep believing that myth....I have a bridge for sale, too. The only reasons that the courts have not thrown out the code requirement a (1) a case has never been brought (Federal courts do not issue advisory rulings, they require an actual case) because: (2) FCC requires that suitable accommodations be made for an applicant's observable or claimed disabilities when tests which do not otherwise discrimninate are given, and (3) the Federal courts in a matter such as this require that the plaintiff exhaust all administrative appeals and in general they defer to the judgment of the regulatory agencies in the area of the agency's expertise such as the requirements for a license as long as the requirements are equitably applied and reasonable accommodations (see #2 above) are made. Shortly after the US ratifies the new treaty which no longer requires the ability to send and receive code the US courts will throw out the FCC's code requirement. Nah... even if such a case is brought, any regulatory attorney worth his/her salt can tie it up pending FCC action in its own sweet time. The courts take a dim view of irrelevant requiremnts, you are going to have a a hard time convincing the courts that ability to receive code at 5 wpm is necessary requirement to "talk over the radio". See #3 above. Morse has much in common with the use of the sliderule. 40 years ago when I was in school engineers spent several weeks of class studying the use of the sliderule and logarithms to simplify calculations. Maybe in your school. In my engineering school - one of the top 3 in the US - one had to know how to use both the sliderule and log tables in order to be admitted, which for me was 50 years ago next month.... I have better ways to spend my time than studying Morse code but I still can find the power of a number using a log log slide rule K+E Log Log Duplex Vector -- I take it out once a year to prove to my computer-geek son that I can still do it..... But as to communications law....leave that to us attorney specialists. This is MY field. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Registered Professsional Engineer Principal Attorney Communications Law Center San Francisco, CA From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|