Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ryan, KC8PMX wrote:
"Hans Kohb" wrote in message news:91abb4385c0f0e49bb49ad536db3ac61.128005@mygat e.mailgate.org... "charlesb" wrote in message The fact that you can point out bad behavior done in the past does nothing to justify further bad behavior today or tomorrow. Instead, it points out the need to do better, to set our sights on where we really want to be. Charles and I have found many reasons to disagree in the past, but on this matter we are 100% in agreement. Here on rrap the pro-coders, no-coders, slow-coders, and limp coders rail on and on about a subject long since put to bed by the regulators, and the whole meaningless fight takes on a surreal similarity to the fights between sailboaters and motorboaters, arguing which is more technically advanced, which can get through when conditions are bad, which is modern vs. invented in the olden days, etc., etc., etc. As all the efforts that have been put towards the arguments and other negative stuff, were put to postive use, maybe the world of amateur radio around us would not be "coming one step closer to extinction." If those efforts were put to building amateur radio in general, we would be better off. Yeahh, everyone thinks that. Problem is they want everyone's opinion to match their own.... And there are plenty of differeing definitions and opinions of exactly what ppositive is. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|