Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dan Finn"
writes: "Len Over 21" wrote in message ... On most modern HF transceivers, the 3rd harmonic has the strongest content of RF. The 3rd harmonic of 3.5 to 4.0 MHz is 10.5 to 12 MHz and there aren't many "ham listening frequencies" there, are there? For most modulated sine waves, the 3rd harmonic is usually the strongest *harmonic* although it depends upon several factors. Generally, the odd harmonic components add and the negative components subtract with modulated sine waves. Oh my, such interesting math (which wasn't shown)...:-) That isn't quite the case in any real world OR the theoretical world. First of all, in the real world, you must be presuming some absolute zero phase shift for each harmonic to make your statement. That just doesn't exist. I can do the numbers on the series formulas for AM, FM, or PM no problem but so few in here can follow even the beginnings of such that I won't care to put it in public view...:-) Having said that, most modern rigs that produce FCC quality signals will filter such harmonics several 10's of dB rendering reception almost impossible except in the near field. Really?!? They work PERFECTLY ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS ALL THE TIME?!?!?! That's not a realistic view, but feel free to indulge if you've laid out a big plastic for a couple kilodollars worth of transceiver. :-) That old standby tube output matching circuit, the "Pi-network" is only good for about 18 db per octave attenuation above cutoff frequency. Not all modern transceivers have such "lowpass filters" since they rely on Class B or AB linear amplifiers with rather broadband transformers matching PA to load. A typical 100 W RF transceiver has a fundamental power output of +50 dbm. If there is as much as "60 db harmonic attenuation" in it, the harmonics can be -10 dbm into the load. That's 100 microWatts and DOES radiate and rather beyond the Near Field...the level is a lot higher than most "40 db over S9" signals (depending on who assigned what levels to a local transceiver S meter). I thought I needed to correct this BS, that emanates from someone who claims to understand modern amateur technology theory. Feel free to do your numbers in public, senior. Call it all the "BS" you want to. When you can actually MAKE a linear (of any class) go as low as 40 db down on total harmonic output, I'll be giving you a round of applause. Hams transmitting signals of any significance on 12MHz will not be hams for long. Oh? Were there any recent NALs published at the FCC or ARRL sites on such things? Let us know, please, I've not seen any of those concerning out-of-ham-band interference due to harmonic generation. LHA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 | Policy | |||
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
Sign in the petition against the abuse of the Band Plan forward this message to your buddies) | Dx | |||
My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition | Policy |