Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"charlesb" wrote
Just for fun: Try to "Google" "freeband echolink". Lots of interesting links there. Just for fun, I did. Results below. Maybe I used the wrong Google? 73, Hans Your search - "freeband echolink" - did not match any documents. Suggestions: - Make sure all words are spelled correctly. - Try different keywords. - Try more general keywords. Also, you can try Google Answers for expert help with your search. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"K0HB" wrote in message om... "charlesb" wrote Just for fun: Try to "Google" "freeband echolink". Lots of interesting links there. Just for fun, I did. Results below. Maybe I used the wrong Google? Probably just don't know how to use it. My ten-year old son just managed it just fine. Perhaps you should try again. Charles Brabham, N5PVL |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"K0HB" wrote in message om... "charlesb" wrote Just for fun: Try to "Google" "freeband echolink". Lots of interesting links there. Just for fun, I did. Results below. Maybe I used the wrong Google? I just managed to duplicate your results. Hans. I had to leave the quotes around the two words, in order to get it to mess up. Charles Brabham, N5PVL |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"charlesb" wrote in message ... "K0HB" wrote in message om... "charlesb" wrote Just for fun: Try to "Google" "freeband echolink". Lots of interesting links there. Just for fun, I did. Results below. Maybe I used the wrong Google? Hans, you appear to disagree with my post about echolink, but you do not offer any counterpoint to the arguements I made... Instead, you seem to be going into "insult and mindless nit-pick" mode. You decided to Troll. In the future, when you respond to rational, reasonable arguement with a kindergarten level response, I will ignore you, and just figure that you have no arguement. That's pretty well the case here, isn't it Hans? Charles Brabham, N5PVL |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... Good grief, Charles. All Hans did was tell you that he tried a search and posted the results he got. If you can extrapolate a disagreement from the post that Hans submitted, I suggest to you that you were dearly searching for one... Kim W5TIT Yes, it's true. I have come to know Hans over the years. Charles, N5PVL |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Robert Casey
writes: No surprise there Mike. No calls, no decency, no license. Access available to anyone that can lie their way in. Yep....what a system. And someone can obtain a ham radio rig and go on the air with a bootleg call. Same difference. Not really! First off, once you get beyond the HT or magmount-on-the-filing-cabinet stage, it's a lot more trouble to set up a ham station. Second (and this is the biggie) the only way for a bootlegger to avoid lots of negative attention from other hams is to act legitimate. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
First to blame are the offenders obviously, Second to blame are the Control
Operators that are supposed to be monitoring the damned thing to catch it before it gets out of hand. It's just that simple. -- Ryan, KC8PMX FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!) --. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-. ... --. .... - . .-. ... "Hans K0HB" wrote in message news:abf9456ab6ea1277416156c788ee6207.128005@mygat e.mailgate.org... "Mike Coslo" wrote Hans, would you want your children or grandchildren to listen to that filth on your radio? It doesn't have any place in the ARS, but it's what I'm hearing. Of course foul language has no place in the ARS!!!! DUH!!!!! So you blame EchoLink, FM, repeaters, or do you blame the creeps who commit the offense? Good luck on this one now! 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Mike,
I do believe it does serve some purpose...... I have a friend that goes to Arizona every winter due to him and his wife's health issues and he does not have much there to use for equipment. He and I chat via Echolink on a regular basis on the link point connected where he is at. I also have developed some friendships with the people that frequent that access point (simplex access point, not a repeater one) as well. He is a 30+ year Extra class licensee so he CAN operate just about anywhere but only has 2m/70cm access when he goes there. In this case it is a very productive use of the system. In this particular circumstance we would never be able to communicate if it wasn't for the system. Other than a little experimentation with it at first, I have not used it for much more than to communicate with him though. -- Ryan, KC8PMX FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!) --. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-. ... --. .... - . .-. ... And even though I have tried to look into Echolink with an open mind, in the end, I just don't think of it as a ham type sport - except for those that just want to talk. And I'm more into the hobby to build things, contest, and try to stretch my radio legs - not just talk. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote in message ... Mike, I do believe it does serve some purpose...... I have a friend that goes to Arizona every winter due to him and his wife's health issues and he does not have much there to use for equipment. He and I chat via Echolink on a regular basis on the link point connected where he is at. I also have developed some friendships with the people that frequent that access point (simplex access point, not a repeater one) as well. He is a 30+ year Extra class licensee so he CAN operate just about anywhere but only has 2m/70cm access when he goes there. In this case it is a very productive use of the system. In this particular circumstance we would never be able to communicate if it wasn't for the system. Other than a little experimentation with it at first, I have not used it for much more than to communicate with him though. You could say the same things if your friend had been using a cell-phone or regular telephone, Ryan. You most especially could say the same things if they had been using ICQ or any other form of Internet chat. The fact that people use Echolink to successfully communicate does not magically make the Internet connection "ham radio". An important distinction to keep in mind is that our hobby is not called "Amateur Communication", where any form of communication will serve but rather "Amateur Radio", where the focus is solely upon radio communications. The ARRL inadvertently created some confusion about this with thier "communicator" promotions, a few years back. The fact that your friends have decided to slow down and reduce the audio quality of thier Internet chat by hanging a radio on one end or the other does not make that Internet communication "Ham Radio"... It just means that they are willing to put up with reduced performance in thier chat activities, in order to have a "ham radio simulator" at one end or the other. In the end, Echolink serves as an excuse not to use radio to communicate "as a ham", as in the case with your friends. It also very often serves as an excuse not to learn more about the hobby and upgrade, as in the case of the hundreds, perhaps thousands of hams who instantly dropped plans to upgrade, or even to buy a radio upon discovering Echolink. Echolink devotees are just brimming over with excuses, but none of those excuses change the fact that Echolink is an Internet chat, not ham radio. ---------------------------------------------------------- Just for fun: Remember "Hands across America"? It was some kind of a wierd promotion where they tried to get people to join hands in a solid chain, coast to coast! There were some unexpected difficulties in mountanous and desert areas that could have easily been foreseen, but anyway: Imagine a chain of people, coast to coast, passing along a note like we used to do in school, but this note goes from New York to Los Angeles, California! The original note is written down from a message heard on a handy-talky from a New York repeater. They pass the note, thousands of people passing it hand-to-hand across the whole U.S. and finally at the end, the note is read into the microphone of another H/T, tuned to a repeater in Los Angeles. Headline: "Hams use handy-talkies to communicate from New York to Los Angeles!" ----------------------------------------------------------- I believe it would be stretching things just a bit too much to call it an "amateur radio" communication, don't you? Charles Brabham, N5PVL |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Au Contraire
Echolink is an Internet chat FOR Amateur Radio Operators And anything that allows communication between Hams gotta be OK. Just another communication vehicle Get over it! I never use it but can easily understand why it can be of value to others. And that from a 25 Year extra class ham. Hey CW, SSB, RTTY, PSK31, Packet, NTS, IRLP, EchoLink, Phone Patch, et al -- communicate communicate is da word. Signal In The Noise But MDS ------------------------------------------------------------ SNIP Da Rationale Echolink devotees are just brimming over with excuses, but none of those excuses change the fact that Echolink is an Internet chat, not ham radio. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
iss qso on echolink monday 2004-8-16 | General | |||
Echolink and ATV on The ISS project | General | |||
echolink node in baghdad - soon | Dx | |||
Echolink is great for those who.. | General | |||
echolink 132,000 users in 139 different countries | Digital |