LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 13th 03, 03:59 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Bob Brock wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:57:21 -0400, Mike Coslo wrote:


Bob Brock wrote:



Try searching the web and not the ng's.


Against my better judgement, I'll communicate with you.

Re-read my post.

Explain how a search engine works.

Explain how I can get 104 hits vs your 39,000.

Explain how you can get 39,000 hits. I got 24,500 hits when I did it
your way, but those numbers can change.



Click on the link. I did and here is what I got...BTW, this is copy
and paste, so it's exactly what's there.
-----------------------------
Searched the web for 1/4 wave dipole. Results 1 - 10 of about
38,900. Search took 0.20 seconds
-----------------------------

Someone is lying and anyone who wants to click on the link can tell
who. BTW, I found five sites that list 1/4 wave dipoles and one site
that lists a 3/4 wave dipole in the first ten listed.

Think about how being specific in search params will give you more
relevent results than just typing in the words, which will give you many
many hits on sometimes only one of the words.

Oh I forgot, you don't have to explain. But that won't make you correct,
either.

- mike KB3EIA -



No, since I'm already correct and have documented it, there is no need
for me to prove anything. You know, I have better things to do right
now than to click on a link that I've already provided to show that it
says the same thing that it said when I posted it.

Plonk for now. I may take you back out when I get caught up on
things, but I really don' have time to deal with liars right now.



Perhaps if Mr. Brock does have me killfiled, someone could explain to
him that if he wants to find relevant hits on 1/4 wave dipole, he can
just put the words in quote marks on Yahoo or Google.

Then the search will return relevant hits, rather than simple
occurrences of the individual words, along with the hits wanted. There
is no doubt in my mind that he got those 39,500 hits. It is symptomatic
of poor database searching technique.

His 39,500 hit number, for all it's sound and fury, signifies nothing.

Then please tell him I will be happy to be filtered from his mail
forever if possible.

- Mike KB3EIA -


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017