Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick Carroll" wrote in message ... Clint wrote: If you refuse to learn how to handle radio's most basic mode you can never be able to regard yourself as fully qualified in ham radio communciations. That's just the Way it Is. Live with it. I'm sorry but that is YOUR oppinion. What counts is the decision of those in authority, namely the FCC. Son, you might want to learn somewhere along the way that opinion is sometimes congruent with fact, sometimes not. No matter what the FCC says or does, it can't alter facts. And nowhere have they ever said that a no-code license is a fully qualified ham. So far the UK, Netherlands and several other countries have done exactly that. Once all code testing is ended by the FCC will you accept that action as supporting the FCC position that morse isn't needed to be a "fully qualified ham?" Additionally, I don't recall anywhere seeing any FCC reference to the concept of a "fully qualified ham". Is that a new license class? In fact, the retired Chief of the Amateur and Citizen's Division of FCC (now called something else) stated in his comments on the NCVEC pettion (which BTW he helped write) that it was an oxymoron to expect an Extra class ham to be a expert on ham radio if he doesn't know Morse code. Thus he supports a code test for Extras. Does he speak for the FCC today? And it should be obvious, to anyone who actually owns and uses a thought process - when Morse code is a widely-used mode within ham radio, *anyone* who can't use it simply and factually *cannot* be a fully qualified ham - No matter what license or privileges the FCC gives them. What a crock. On that basis, if you can't speak Spanish, Chineese, and several other languages commonly used by hams around the globe, then you shouldn't be considered "qualified" either. And YOU will have to live with the decisions THEY make. Which can't change facts. Facts are immutable. Live with it. Any ham not able to operate CW is simply and factually not fully qualified. Your Opinion yes, a fact? Not at all. And that's an opinion I'm entitled to. Cheers as always, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | General |