Bruce, one percent of your brain power wouldn't help a snail figure out
where the opening of his shell was. One hundred percent of your brain power
might (on a good day).


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

Well thats amazing Dwight, I guess yuou and Brian most have less Brain Power
than that.

In article , (N2EY)
writes:

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,
(N2EY)
writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,
(N2EY)
writes:

In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:

YOU are NOT on any QRZ listing for any country.

Neither are you. Len ;-) ;-) ;-)

I've never PRETENDED to be one.

Why are you shouting, Len?

Not shouting.

Yes, you are. Capitalizing every letter in a word is online shouting. Bad
manners on your part. It also indicates you are out of control.

Perhaps you should take a time-out and come back to the group when you can
behave in a mature fashion.

Do your eyes hurt?

Nope.

I make no bones about not being licensed as an AMATEUR and have
said so from day one in here.

Everything isn't all about you, Len.

Apparently the PCTA think so.

How so? Would you rather that nobody replied to your posts?

Not a problem. ALL you PCTAs can whip out the old "killfile" and hide
heads and eyes in the sand.

Makes it easier to comment to the Rest of the Readers. :-)

Strong opposition to your opinions seems to really bother you. Correction of
your mistakes enrages you.

Since they can't support their view of retaining the morse code test, they
attack personalities.

Who is "they"?

All of the PCTAs in here.

What you have is some idiot who PRETENDS to be an amateur
something in Canada and won't identify himself.

Why do you think Leo is pretending anything?

She hasn't got the guts to identify herself.

"She"? How do you know Leo is female?

How do you she isn't?

Despite your pain with PREVIOUS screen names, I've never attempted
to post anything without identifying myself.

Yes, you have, Many of your posts do not contain anything that indicates who
you really are.

There YOU are MISTAKEN.

I've listed my employers in here and I've given names and callsigns to
friends who are radio amateur licensees. My bylines in Ham Radio
magazine carried the same USPS address I have now.

Since you won't accept any e-mail attachments from me, the only
recourse for you seems to be a lot of flame war ignition attempts and
not bother to check anyone out.

In fact, for all anyone really knows, you could be someone else who has
appropriated the persona of one Leonard H. Anderson.

Think whatever you imagine.

I am listed in the Southern California white pages...my postal address
is not secret...you can hire a private investigator and have my neighbors
interviewed. No problem. You can also find yourself in a civil court
or (in some government districts) being investigated for harrassment.

You have enough raw data to ascertain who is who. You don't want
to. You would rather have your little jollies in here making your
"opponents" look bad.

Has anyone on this NG actually met you in person or on the air?

Not that I know of...but then I don't know who all the readers are since
they don't post. :-)

Start with KD6JG. Work on to W6MJN, then N2JTV.

Several more know me but there are over 600,000 licensed radio
amateurs who are NOT in this newsgroup.

That's irrelevant to your little "cause" in this message, isn't it?

You want to "run" this newsgroup because you are here so much and
spend so much time posting.


I'm not misdirecting. 'vshah101' did not give a name or callsign, even when
asked. But you had no problem with him or his anti-amateur remarks.

YOU are MISTAKEN again. ERROR...you bad.

Some individuals in here post against YOUR and PCTA viewpoints.
That does not make them "anti-amateur."

You think of yourself as "representing ALL of US amateur radio" through
your expressed opinions in here. You don't. You "represent" only
opinions and viewpoints of a small group of PCTAs who wish to be the
elite of the US amateur radio community...one way or another.

You don't "own" US amateur radio and never did, therefore you don't have
ANY judgement value about who is "anti-amateur" or even "pro-amateur."

That's a fact, Jack ;-)

Yes, Morrie, what I just wrote IS fact.

The SUBJECT line of this thread is "1/4 Wave Dipoles."

So? Subject lines never deterred you from going off in other directions.

I posted IN this thread about dipoles. It's in Google if you've not
saved it to your HD.

YOU and some anonymous person want to use any thread as a
character assassination venue so that you can "get even" for all the
alleged "wrongs" committed against your radiogod personna.

THAT's a FACT.

You sound threatened and angry because someone has noticed your double
standard of behavior towards anonymous posters.

Not a problem to me. You MANUFACTURE a situation and try to exploit
it so that you have an excuse for talking bad about someone who has
opposite viewpoints to yours.

All you need to do is search Google for a lot of PCTA general harrassment
such as from the hundreds of postings by "K4YZ" that go un-answered
because that kind of posting only serves to make the harrasser happy.

This whole newsgroup was created to discuss-debate-argue the code
test issue.

And other things. You are not the moderator, Len. Much as you want to control
how things happen, you're not the boss here. Live with it.

YOU ARE NOT THE MODERATOR EITHER, JIMMIE.

LEARN TO LIVE WITH THAT.

It wasn't created for the sole amusement or daily guru column from
Jimmie Miccolis where he would sit in judgement of all others.

It wasn't created for the sole amusement or daily guru column from
Leonard H. Anderson where he would sit in judgement of all others.

Are you "threatened" by all those others in here who have opposite
opinions from yours? Are you feeling "superior" because you espouse
the standards and practices of US amateur radio of over a half century
ago? Are you so intimidated by those who have the courage to think
for themselves AND to speak out?

YOU sit in judgement on everyone who does not consider morse code
testing as necessary. A very consistent judgement, a condemning
judgement as if you are a holy radio god.

That's really a rather common syndrome of the PCTAs. They allow only
ONE viewpoint...theirs.

All other viewpoints shall be put down, destroyed, those who voice them
shall be harrassed, hunted, and so forth until they stop.

That's a lovely example of dictatorial totalitarianism, the arrogance of the
squatters who feel they "own" the hobby.

That reflects badly on the US amateur radio community when you PCTA
act that way. You are unable to present counter-arguments to NCTAs so
you call all their arguments "illogical, mistaken, or plain wrong" and then
want to harrass, intimidate, and humiliate them.

YOU may not think such is "anti-amateur." Someone attacked your Ego
Turf and you think "anything goes" in "fighting" them.

I'd call that Elitist, Arrogant, and Dictatorial but the Turf Fighters would
get
angry again...so I won't call it that.

I wonder what the FCC would call it if anyone there chanced to look in and
read what the PCTA think, say, and do in here?

On 26 Sep 2003 18:29:56 GMT, (Len Over 21) wrote:

hasn't got the guts to identify herself.

How do you she isn't?

Well, I suppose I could be Leonette. Male it is, though....

I have identified myself. I'm Leo

I've listed my employers in here and I've given names and callsigns to
friends who are radio amateur licensees. My bylines in Ham Radio
magazine carried the same USPS address I have now.

But, who knows for sure that you are indeed the person that you claim
to be? Who on the group can vouch for you?

You don't "own" US amateur radio and never did, therefore you don't have
ANY judgement value about who is "anti-amateur" or even "pro-amateur."

And you are not a an Amateur at all - your opinion, therefore, is that
of an observer - not a participant. No more welcome than mine would
be if I went in to the nearest VFW post and started telling the folks
there what my 'opinions' of the way the Korean conflict was handled.
I was not a part of it, my opinion is inconsequential.

(Say, yours wouldn't be welcome there, either, OM ?....)

That's a lovely example of dictatorial totalitarianism, the arrogance of the
squatters who feel they "own" the hobby.

Your 'hobby', Len? You're an outsider. Not a member. On the
outside, looking in....

We'll take your ideas under advisement, though - thanks for your
input.

That reflects badly on the US amateur radio community when you PCTA
act that way.

Usenet is worldwide - as is Amateur Radio - there are more than just
US Amateurs in this group. It's a big world out there, Len....
And, this is a policy group - not just 'code / nocode' - orat least it
should be...there are bigger issues facong our hobby than the code one
today!

I'd call that Elitist, Arrogant, and Dictatorial but the Turf Fighters would
get angry again...so I won't call it that.

Projecting, Len? Sounds like someone we both know....

Plus, there was a statement about "going to court for harassment" that
was too laughable to quote. Len, all you do is harass folks on this
group - that's your entire raison d'etre.

Intelligent debate is what the group should be about - if you're not
up to the challenge, then - as they say in Little Jerusalem down in
Old Mexico - adios, Alter Kocker!

30, Leo

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...


I wonder what the FCC would call it if anyone there chanced to look in and
read what the PCTA think, say, and do in here?

Retain the code tests.

w3rv

In article .net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:



You're the one obviously obsessed with her breasts. You mention the
subject almost as much as Larry does (and that's a lot).


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

Dwight:

Please provide a direct quote of each and every instance of my referring
to Kim's breasts (excluding this one, of course.) That will not be quite as
difficult as it sounds, I assure you.

73 de Larry, K3LT