LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old September 22nd 03, 02:00 AM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message
...


Wrong again.


BZZZZZT, wrong on your part.

There was a whole slew of N-class licenses, I knew several of them...
N5VSQ, N5XDT, etc.

Clint
KB5ZHT


Those calls were not issued on the basis of whether they had or had not
passed a code test. Those call signs were issued to people who had passed
General and Technician with code as well as no-code Techs. There is NO way
to tell from a call sign whether they passed code as the call signs were
issued on the basis of license class only.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
(an original N call issued when I passed my Tech with code in 1992. I have
never held a codeless license).

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using Existing Law Against BPL David Stinson General 0 March 7th 04 08:14 PM
BPL - Comments on the original Inquiry document AK General 0 February 8th 04 02:18 AM
jury-rigging radio antenna for HDTV use? Jonathan Epstein Antenna 6 December 30th 03 08:18 PM
Whaddya think folks? WA8ULX Policy 44 September 17th 03 07:31 PM
existing plc qrn?? or something else? David Robbins Policy 1 July 12th 03 12:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017