Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Leo wrote in message . ..
How so? I have never stated my position one way or the other with respect to mandatory Morse testing. I have stated that I did get my 5 WPM to get on to HF because I had to by law, and that using it for QSOs is beginning to grow on me. That doesn't mean that I think everyone should have to do it! Unfortunately, that makes no difference in THIS forum, Leo. I've expressed not only "tolerence" of NCT's, but have praised the accomplishments of most of the one's I know, but Lennie, Brain and a few others always ignore those. It ruins thier rants. Any opportunity for them to cite "HYPOCRITE" and thereby APPEAR to be "defending" themselves from some percieved onslaught is never missed. As a BIG example, Larry Roll, who is adamantly "pro-code", has posted countless items on his DIGITAL activities, yet Lennie and his minions want yo0u (and other countelss faceless readers) to believe that he's still banging out Code with a Model T spark coil transmitter. So, does that make me pro or con, for mandatory testing? Where's the obvious? Hmmm - there's that old reading comprehension problem again.... Yes..."reading comprehension" is a problem in this forum. I think that you just like to stir things up, Sir - your diatribes appear to serve no other useful purpose. Of course you are aware that the future of Morse testing will be decided at the government level, by committees of civilized people - and not within this group. As such, your energies and passionate rants are for nought, as they will not sway the decision makers one bit. Like complaining with the guys on the loading dock about the boss - won't change anything, but I bet that would make someone one feel more important and in control, huh? (know the feeling?) Myself and two or three others have, in times past, tried to "organize" collective voices on certain REAL policy issues, but they are always thwarted by Lennie, Brain, and a handful of others who invariably manage to make almost every post here about the Code issue. It's really sad in many ways, becasue we have a truly remarkable opportunity of our own at our disposal, yet a very narrowminded few would rather just spit and snarl about perceived "wrongs" rather than truly move forward. C'est le vie. 73 Steve, K4YZ Leo On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:21:09 -0500, "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote: WHOA, PUTZBREATH! Leo, an obvious PCTA, said this in a previous thread.. and I quote.. "Not intellectual enough to make his point by rational arguement, he resorts to name calling and other juvenile tactics to 'get his way'. " oops. A PCTA just did that, not a NCTA type. Add "hypocrisy" to the list of the PCTA flaws in tactics and debate skills. Clint, there's nothing here to debate. Nothing. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Theological Rant | Antenna | |||
Rant | Homebrew |