![]() |
"WA8ULX" wrote in message ... We CANNOT AFFORD to miss-identify other sources of interference as "BPL" or we just lend credence to the BPL folks' claim that we're "crying wolf." What ever you do, STOP listening to KARL, hes just trying to get credit for NCI. As most of you know, I normally simply ignore Bruce's idiotic rants, but, just to set the record straight, my activity vis a vis BPL has nothing to do with NCI ... therefore, there is NO attempt to "get credit for NCI" for anything I do related to the BPL threat ... Carl - wk3c |
just to set the record straight, my activity vis a vis BPL has nothing
to do with NCI ... therefore, there is NO attempt to "get credit for NCI" for anything I do related to the BPL threat ... Carl - wk3c Then BPL is a sure thing with Karl at the Helm |
In article .net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: Kim W5TIT Gawd I wish she would change her pills. I wish you would start taking some... :-) |
|
BULL****.
Nowhere in Carl's work to document BPL have I seen any mention of the code test, nor NCI. It doesnt matter what he says, hes still mr NCI. |
"Len Over 21" wrote in message ... In article .net, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: Kim W5TIT Gawd I wish she would change her pills. I wish you would start taking some... :-) Have I rattled your cage a bit Lenny ? I sure hope so. And BTW I could care less what you think or say. I just hope I annoy the crap out of you. Dan/W4NTI |
www.arrl.org follow the links.
And yes its much worse than a contest. You wont even hear the contesters. Dan/W4NTI "James Wilson" wrote in message . .. What does BPL sound like? Can someone post a wav file somewhere so it can be identified? Is it worse that the Pennsylvania QSO party? BPL, at least for Michigan. I don't know when it will be an actual reality, as opposed to being in the planning stages, but will keep current with their project! |
|
"Dick Carroll" wrote in message ... Carl R. Stevenson wrote: "James Wilson" wrote in message . .. What does BPL sound like? Can someone post a wav file somewhere so it can be identified? Is it worse that the Pennsylvania QSO party? The video on the ARRL website shows a couple of BPL variants ... one that uses SS and another (test area 4) that uses OFDM. They sound different. Again, I cannot over-emphasize the importance of making SURE that complaints of "BPL interference" are REALLY from BPL and not some other source. The LAST thing we need now is a bunch of people "crying wolf." (Real complaints are one thing, crying wolf will only HURT us.) 73, Carl - wk3c You raise an interesting question, Carl. How exactly should the average ham go about proving that the RFI is indeed BPL, when the BPL people say "That's not us!'?? BPL has a unique "signature" (in the spectral/time domains) that can be used to ID it. Since there are different systems (SS from main.net and OFDM from Amperion, for example) they have different signatures, which are distinct from other sources of interference and more traditional power line noise (of course the utilities are responsible for fixing the latter, too ... though their record is poor). Carl - wk3c |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com