Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
(snip) The end result could be something that FCC and much of the amateur commnunity would support. I disagree. For the reasons already stated, most specifically that the proposal doesn't serve a need not already addressed in the current licensing system, I don't think the FCC would have any interest at all in his proposal. When you consider the amount of changes needed to implement the proposal (rule changes, licensing procedures, and so on), I suspect the FCC would be dead set against it. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |