LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 8th 03, 06:33 PM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"N2EY" wrote:

(snip) The end result could be something that
FCC and much of the amateur commnunity
would support.



I disagree. For the reasons already stated, most specifically that the
proposal doesn't serve a need not already addressed in the current licensing
system, I don't think the FCC would have any interest at all in his
proposal. When you consider the amount of changes needed to implement the
proposal (rule changes, licensing procedures, and so on), I suspect the FCC
would be dead set against it.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 14 Petitions Len Over 21 Policy 3 November 10th 03 12:31 AM
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing Len Over 21 Policy 0 October 22nd 03 11:38 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Policy 0 September 20th 03 04:13 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017