Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "N2EY" wrote Yep. It's the annual "vintage radio" issue. Says so right on the cover. Thank you, Thank You, THANK YOU!!! You make my point exactly!!! I'm very much an ARRL supporter, but an "Annual Vintage Radio Issue" is a pathetic statement about the technical leadership out of 225 Main Street. Sorta validates LHA's persistent jeremiads about how backward amateurs seem to him. How much nicer if there were an "Annual Future Systems Issue". 73, de Hans, K0HB Is it really too much to have one issue out of 12 address vintage radio? Afterall there are some hams to whom this is of interest either practical or just as a window into history. Although my own interest is in new radios and how much they can pack into how little space, the vintage issue is a nice relaxing look at the past. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General |