Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Oops sorry, I accidentally posted without comment N2EY wrote: In article .net, "KØHB" writes: How much nicer if there were an "Annual Future Systems Issue". Why not? Isn't there room for both? How many articles have there been in QST over the past few years on PSK, MFSK, WSJT, digital voice, IRLP.....? Here you have a pattern, Jim. As much as I like the new modes, All they are is install the software and hook up the interface. Troubleshooting is which software switch to change. Besides that PSK, MFSK, WSJT, digital voice, and IRLP are not "future systems". They are here now. A "future system" would have to be something envisioned but not yet set up in hardware and software to do it. In other words, it would need to be an issue of speculation. Now whether that would be good or bad or popular or unpopular, I don't know. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General |