Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY wrote:
In article .net, "KØHB" writes: "N2EY" wrote That means passing the post-restructuring 35 question Tech test is "more difficult" than passing both the pre-restructuring 30 question Novice test *and* the 5 wpm code receiving test. Yes. Well, there you have it. Element 1 is easier than 5 questions on the written test. Balderdash! (But only barely, and it is woefully inadequate for the resultant privileges.) Woefully inadequate? FCC disagrees! In fact, in 2000 FCC drastically *reduced* the written testing needed for a Tech. From two tests and pools, frowm which were derived tests with a total of 65 questions down to one test of 35 questions and a combined pool. FCC thinks that 35 question Tech test is adequate. The same FCC that sees "no regulatory purpose" in code tests. Is FCC mistaken? Another argument for the no test agenda: We regularly hurtle at each other at combined speeds of 150 miles per hour and more, wearing nothing but street clothes, and strapped into devices carrying a large load of almomst explosivly flammable liquid. And we're afraid to let people run radios that are putting out the same power as the microwave oven over my stove? Have the changes of 2000 gotten us more tinkerers per unit time than before? What the hell are "tinkerers per unit time"? Sorry, Hans, I thought you had an engineering background. ;-) I'll rephrase: Have the changes of 2000 resulted in more tinkerers entering the ARS in a given time period (say, per year) than before the changes were made? Most of the tinkerers I know are pro-code test amateurs. Mine isn't a scientific survey, but I've noticed a common thread among them. They are very interested in RF technology. They are intensely interested in Amateur radio. They really like getting their hands down into the equipment. And whether this is related or not, they are also very interested in Morse code. I've seen some cutting edge stuff made by these same people. I do not know one technician that has done as much as build his or her own antenna. Well wait, I built a 1/4 wave ground plane for 2 meters when I was a Tech. But that's it. Based on that admittidly small sample, I would have to say that we are putting out less tinkers per unit time, and almost certainly less per hamcapita. (Hans, that means tinkerers per total numbe of Hams. 8^)) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General |