| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: But others will argue that an easier entry-level license will attract more new hams, and therefore more who will want to *understand radio*. After all, isn't education one of the B&Ps of the ARS? It boils down to the old argument of: "Become a ham to learn about radio" vs. "Learn about radio to become a ham" What it should be and too many fail to realize is that the proper sequence is "Learn radio basics to become a ham and then as a ham continue to learn and increase one's expertise." It should not be one versus the other. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||