| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Dave Heil
writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article om, "Dee D. Flint" writes: What it should be and too many fail to realize is that the proper sequence is "Learn radio basics to become a ham and then as a ham continue to learn and increase one's expertise." It should not be one versus the other. The ONLY way to have an interest in radio is to get a ham license. You could say that you have an interest in amateur radio, Len. It isn't true, but you could say it. I haven't. I don't. The only way to have an interest in radio is to get a ham license. To you it doesn't count at all that "interest in radio" can result in a half century of professional work...including design in radio. To you it doesn't count that "interest in radio" AND electronics can lead to very enjoyable hobby activities in building, testing, designing new electronics things ('electronics' includes radio). No, FIRST one "must" get an AMATEUR license according to Herr Robust. You could say that you have an interest in gardening, but if your interest extends only to walking past someone's garden and advising that they're not properly caring for their climatus, you aren't a gardner. I've been into "gardening" for over 40 years. At this same address. No amateur license required. No LICENSE required to garden. Not a problem. I can discuss gardening with any neighbor and they don't take offense. We share ideas, experiences, help each other out. In here, the arrogant officious ones DICTATE as to how all shall behave according to their holy rules. You could say that you have a great interest in flying an airplane, but if your interest extends to buying a ticket to fly to Chicago, you aren't an aviator. I don't have a great interest in flying an airplane now. Too expensive. I was once a student pilot. Still no license required for that. Not even to operate a radio...already had the First Phone, so no 3rd Class Restricted permit necessary. An amateur radio license isn't legal to use on civil airways frequencies, is it? I am into flying R/C model aircraft on a casual basis...and have on and off for 40+ years. NO license required there to use the 72 MHz band channels. I've been into flying model aircraft for 60 years and even worked as a professional at Testors before they got into the plastic model side of that hobby. I was an International contestant in that some time ago. Reality points to the fact that you have nothing to do with amateur radio other than to make submissions to the FCC regarding an avocation in which you take no part. Reality points to the fact that you CANNOT accept any opinions contrary to your own with grace or gentle manner...you constantly, beligerantly go after any person who can stand up to you and show where your ideas aren't valid. The FCC accepts ALL input on ALL radio services, Herr Robust. They don't need "licenses" in any radio service to accept comments. I know that is a very foreign thought to your proud, arrogant holiness, but that IS true. I'd like to see YOU address the FCC in the same manner as you address others. Good luck on that one now! LHA |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
| NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||