Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article k.net, "KØHB"
writes: HF privileges were granted in the past by taking a test far less demanding than the current Technician test. The old Novice written plus 5 wpm code was "far less demanding"? OK.... And Technicians of the past took the General written test AND a Morse test, but were not allowed on HF, but they could get a (simultaneous) Novice license and operate on HF (even though the General written they'd taken for Technician didn't allow them on HF or 2 meters). And you new kids think MY licensing proposal is strange! Even stranger is the fact that there was a period of time (1970s?) when FCC did not allow the simultaneous possession of both the Novice and Technician licenses, so when a ham passed the written test for Tech, he/she lost all HF privs - even though both licenses required the same code test. Merry (whatever god you worship) Feast, Happy Solstice 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General |